|
Post by discoprincess on Oct 2, 2014 22:08:38 GMT -4
Of course, it's a good idea to get lawyers involved whenever you are dealing with a situation as delicate as surrogacy. But people can be stupid. Many couples use a longtime friend as their surrogate. If there is a long established friendship it would probably be very easy to think, "Oh we don't need a lawyer! Sally won't give us any trouble handing the baby over! She knows how much we want this!" People forget hormones can be a very powerful thing. Well, if the surrogate's hormones had kicked in and prompted her to not want to hand over the baby, then maybe Sherri would have had one less problem.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 28, 2024 19:52:26 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2014 12:02:03 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Neurochick on Oct 30, 2014 14:24:47 GMT -4
The problem isn't that Sherri wants a husband; the problem is that she's vetting men for the wrong things.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 28, 2024 19:52:26 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2015 10:58:21 GMT -4
This was a smooth setup. Too bad Lamar Sally pulled the trigger before the baby was born. What surrogate gets her name listed on the baby's birth certificate? Now she is going on tv to get at Sherri and her money. Sherri Shepherd's Surrogate Breaks Silence
|
|
Nysha
Blueblood
Posts: 1,029
Jul 7, 2007 2:19:58 GMT -4
|
Post by Nysha on Jan 30, 2015 11:06:55 GMT -4
Won't the surrogate be able to prove that she is not the child's biological mother to avoid paying child support? I thought reason surrogate agencies used donor eggs instead of the surrogate's eggs is so the surrogate would have no legal claim to the child.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 28, 2024 19:52:26 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2015 11:20:08 GMT -4
The surrogate is liable because she is listed on the baby's birth certificate as a noncustodial parent. Of course Lamar planned this out to get at Sherri's money; of that there is no doubt. Either the surrogate was in on the scam or the agency she worked for messed up on the paperwork. Thing is, if Lamar hadn't signed up for welfare, she would have been free and clear. He is pond scum.
|
|
|
Post by discoprincess on Jan 30, 2015 11:29:11 GMT -4
The surrogate is liable because she is listed on the baby's birth certificate as a noncustodial parent. I wonder why the surrogate allowed her name to be listed on the birth certificate in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by LurkerNan on Jan 30, 2015 12:35:07 GMT -4
If it's true that she really had nothing to do with Lamar and was hired through an agency, she should sue both Lamar and Sherri to force them to support the kid. She should not be held accountable at all. Her forcing them to support the child protects the child too.
|
|
tortuga
Landed Gentry
Posts: 971
May 4, 2006 20:18:39 GMT -4
|
Post by tortuga on Jan 30, 2015 12:40:33 GMT -4
All the childless people in the world desperate for a baby and these fools are treating theirs like a hot potato...smdh.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Jan 30, 2015 13:08:00 GMT -4
I was thinking about this case the other day, wondering if there was new news. It makes me sad to see it's still as messy as ever. I don't know how to fix this, but I feel so incredibly bad for the kid.
|
|