kayti2212
Guest
Apr 19, 2024 10:41:42 GMT -4
|
Post by kayti2212 on Aug 3, 2008 23:55:01 GMT -4
I would actually believe you if I didn't know any better and you told me she was 35.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 10:41:42 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2008 2:09:39 GMT -4
She has a certain energy and bubbliness about her that makes her quite pretty, imo. She seems like someone you wouldn't mind being friends with. Blake Lively always seems like someone my mother would want me to be friends with. Although, puzzlingly, I still kind of like her.
|
|
|
Post by sugarhigh on Aug 4, 2008 8:16:41 GMT -4
She's so bubbly and happy, I'm kinda hoping that she has some deep, dark career-destroying secret. Just for contrast.
|
|
|
Post by Ladybug on Aug 4, 2008 10:57:14 GMT -4
Ugh. You'd think that she'd wear something a little more youthful for the TEEN Choice Award. She looked so cute at the SOTP2 premiere! I'm disappointed.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 10:41:42 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2008 18:27:20 GMT -4
I'm confused by everyone saying she is beautiful. I think she looks like a rat. She's quite plain. I think this is another case of someone being called a beauty because they happen to be blonde.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 10:41:42 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2008 19:05:30 GMT -4
I think she's pretty...for now. I have no idea if she'll age well though.
I do think she and the other Gossip Girl, Leighton Meester, can get away with wearing extremely short outfits and not looking skanky or stupid. Maybe their youth has something to do with it but when other stars do it they look kind of dumb. Somehow these two manage to pull it off and look fine.
|
|
|
Post by scarletprincess on Aug 4, 2008 20:54:33 GMT -4
I watched the first Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants last night on ABC Family and she had a bangin' body in that movie.
|
|
|
Post by mochakitty on Nov 18, 2008 11:10:13 GMT -4
Rumored to be February's Vogue cover model. Blake at the 5th Anniversary of the CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund (November 17th, NYC): Close-upFull Length Shot
|
|
|
Post by sugarhigh on Nov 18, 2008 11:52:55 GMT -4
Her cover of Vogue is HIDEOUS. They managed to eliminate two of her best assets: her long neck and legs. Only her pretty hair is evident.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 10:41:42 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2008 12:01:58 GMT -4
I'm surprised she got the Vogue cover. I didn't think she was a big enough name to get one. Not that I really have any criteria for who should be on it (I don't really care; I don't really think too deeply about whether one should be a movie star to deserve one) but I am surprised.
But at least they're changing things up I guess. Move over Gwyneth and Kate (Hudson).
|
|