|
Post by prisma on Jun 2, 2015 13:52:10 GMT -4
And Mary-Kate Olsen looks like she got a chin implant. Whoa! It does in this pic. Not so much in this one. I really hope she didn't. Topic: Victoria always looks miserable in photographs. Always. It's beyond the not-smiling thing. I don't think a miserable person could produce such a happy, well-adjusted family, so I wonder what gives.
|
|
|
Post by Atreides on Jun 3, 2015 19:11:49 GMT -4
I'll have to take Vicky's word that she just really, really hates smiling in photos but is otherwise a happy person, hence the happy family.
OT: why do the Olsens always pose like Siamese twins attached at the hip?
|
|
|
Post by discoprincess on Feb 1, 2016 16:34:52 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by GirlyGhoul on Feb 1, 2016 17:05:31 GMT -4
Well, it may be nepotism. But the photos shown in that link look good. (I'm assuming he took them and are not examples of someone else's work) And I'd rather hear of some new star going on for a Beckham shoot than a Terry Richardson shoot any day.
(Of course, if I were a photographer without a soccer star dad and Spice Girl mum I could see feeling really resentful)
|
|
Carolina
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,358
Mar 19, 2005 3:03:24 GMT -4
|
Post by Carolina on Feb 1, 2016 17:17:04 GMT -4
I'm a dumb dumb because at first I took "shot a Burberry campaign" to mean he modeled for a Burberry campaign and couldn't see why these photographers' panties were in such a twist.
Yeah, I can see why photographers with no helpful relations would be upset. That said, it's always nice to see celebrity spawn pursue something other than acting or singing. And GirlyGhoul is right on about taking Brooklyn Beckham any day over Uncle Terry.
|
|
|
Post by GirlyGhoul on Feb 1, 2016 17:22:11 GMT -4
I'm a dumb dumb because at first I took "shot a Burberry campaign" to mean he modeled for a Burberry campaign No, I thought the same thing! Although, in all honesty, with my slight dyslexia/ word jumble style of reading I initially thought he'd been shot and then thought he shot someone. But my first comprehensive thought about an actual photography shoot was that he was the model not the photographer.
|
|
|
Post by prisma on Feb 1, 2016 17:26:36 GMT -4
I immediately thought he was modeling and didn't see what the big deal is. But, yeah, photography is a different matter.
One of the commenters on that link brought up that it's not about his skill as a photographer, it's about his followers on Instagram. In which case this makes perfect sense.
|
|
|
Post by Matilda on Feb 1, 2016 17:33:32 GMT -4
Well his mother just woke up one day and decided to be a fashion designer, so why not? He irritates me so much, but this is only going to get worse. I think we need to brace ourselves for a couple of decades worth of famewhoring from the Beckham spawn.
|
|
freelancergirl
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 387
Mar 17, 2005 19:34:12 GMT -4
|
Post by freelancergirl on Feb 1, 2016 18:19:55 GMT -4
Well his mother just woke up one day and decided to be a fashion designer, so why not? He irritates me so much, but this is only going to get worse. I think we need to brace ourselves for a couple of decades worth of famewhoring from the Beckham spawn. Aw, I know the kids, as I've mentioned here before, and they are honest-to-god sweet, wonderful little humans who are pretty normal, all things considered. Whether or not Brooklyn deserved this - and I can see where the photographers are coming from - I do know that he wants to do this professionally. And I'm not sure that the ire should be directed at Brooklyn, rather at Burberry who obviously made the decision from a point of marketing.
|
|
|
Post by Atreides on Feb 1, 2016 19:57:25 GMT -4
He is holding the camera correctly, so I'll give him that. Of course it's nepotism, but isn't that how most industries work anyway?
|
|