CAgirl
Blueblood
Posts: 1,154
Jan 28, 2005 14:59:05 GMT -4
|
Post by CAgirl on Oct 21, 2014 21:35:44 GMT -4
Funny she was anti-bra back then and now she has her own lingerie line!
|
|
|
Post by discoprincess on Mar 13, 2015 16:07:45 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by beautifulanddamned on Mar 13, 2015 21:50:35 GMT -4
So she can't have custody of herself but she can have custody of her children? Can that be right?
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Mar 13, 2015 22:00:26 GMT -4
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. Did the conservatorship end? Or can you have custody and still be under one? (That link doesn't work.)
|
|
|
Post by biondetta on Mar 14, 2015 5:25:42 GMT -4
Why give her primary custody now anyway? Unless Federline isn't doing a good job with the kids (which doesn't actually seem likely), why uproot the kids from the home they've spent the most time in? I could see maybe giving her unsupervised visitation if she doesn't seem likely to be a threat to the kids, but why give her primary custody?
|
|
|
Post by Spinderella on Mar 14, 2015 7:24:24 GMT -4
Maybe all those DJ jobs that Federline has been doing in Orange County is showing how much he needs money. If she gets full custody, he might not have to pay as much in child support? Lord knows he's got enough kids to worry about that don't live with him.
|
|
Gigiree
Sloane Ranger
Procrastinators Unite. . . Tomorrow.
Posts: 2,548
Jul 23, 2010 10:27:31 GMT -4
|
Post by Gigiree on Mar 14, 2015 8:07:27 GMT -4
I would think it would be the other way around. K-Fed would be receiving quite a bit of child support since he has primary custody. If Britney had it, K-Fed will more than likely have to pay child support to her. This video posted on People's website three days ago has K-Fed talking about how "co-parenting is going great", and no mention of giving up primary custody to Britney.
|
|
|
Post by petitesuite on Mar 14, 2015 9:03:47 GMT -4
Gigigree, I think Spinderella is saying that K-Fed's other child support payments might be higher because they account for the money he gets from Britney. So if she's giving him less money he might in turn be paying less, which makes sense to me, especially in light of the DJ'ing gigs. I don't understand at all how she can have custody when she doesn't have full custody of herself, though, unless there's some legal provision saying the kids are in her conservator's care.
|
|
celerydunk
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,521
May 3, 2005 21:57:59 GMT -4
|
Post by celerydunk on Mar 14, 2015 9:37:08 GMT -4
It does seem questionable that someone that is incapable of caring for themselves can be in charge of two other people.
I wonder if this means we will be seeing more of the kids. Kevin seems to keep them more unwraps. We get the posed happy family picture every now and then and the occasional pap shot, but when they were little and with Britney we saw a lot more of them. Interest in Britney is down, but I wouldn't be surprised if her people try to use the kids to help rehab her image.
|
|
|
Post by eclair on Mar 14, 2015 10:12:35 GMT -4
At this point both boys are old enough to call someone if Britney goes off the rails while they're with her. That might be part of it, they aren't as helpless or dependent as they were last time she had custody of them.
|
|