Deleted
Posts: 0
May 18, 2024 17:46:43 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2015 20:08:26 GMT -4
There are more pics at Daily Mail. There's the come hither pigeon toe pose, followed by the hunched shoulder smirk and the head falling of the neck smirk. And by seductively, they mean braless. Cause, boobs.
|
|
|
Post by ladyboy on Dec 5, 2015 0:29:46 GMT -4
I like how they used the verb "completed" because I don't think she really ever started that outfit.
|
|
|
Post by kostgard on Dec 5, 2015 1:25:01 GMT -4
If you are going to let the sisters swing free, don't hunch over! They look about as even as Shannen Dougherty's eyes ( double meanness! No shade meant for Shannen).
Katie is weird.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Dec 5, 2015 1:42:54 GMT -4
I was sick of my Crazy Courtney avatar, so I'd like to thank Katie for putting some more crazy out there. There really is something wrong with this woman.
|
|
|
Post by Martini Girl on Dec 5, 2015 2:53:14 GMT -4
She reminds me of Josh Holloway's wife (who always poses with her head tilted way to the side). It just doesn't translate to the look she was trying to pull off. I guess we should at least be grateful that she's not wearing some fug booties. Also, that "outfit" looks like a left over from Holmes and Yang.
|
|
iClaudia
Sloane Ranger
"When love and duty are one, grace is within you."
Posts: 2,215
Mar 13, 2005 14:33:41 GMT -4
|
Post by iClaudia on Dec 5, 2015 10:16:45 GMT -4
There must have been some sort of theme for this shindig because everyone looks to be wearing undergarments, lingerie or pajamas.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 18, 2024 17:46:43 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2015 11:51:37 GMT -4
Ginger, I agree. I give her credit for escaping Tom, but she seems to have no perspective; there is no there there. There is something really off about her.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Dec 5, 2015 14:55:07 GMT -4
Ginger, I agree. I give her credit for escaping Tom, but she seems to have no perspective; there is no there there. There is something really off about her. Is she still very isolated? I know she was during the TomKat era. She seems like someone who has been cutoff from normal social contact for so long that she's lost those instincts - she tries to mimic what she thinks is normal behavior, but doesn't realize how weird she looks. (Much like her ex-husband.) It's weird that someone who makes her living re-creating human behavior and emotions is so abnormally bad at it.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Dec 5, 2015 18:47:50 GMT -4
She was always really bad. I never got why profile writers or directors or even critics were gushing about her. She's not a good actress. She's very stuff, awkward, and unnatural. Like, HS theater production/child star in a Hallmark film bad.
I guess she is doing something right for the people who are fans, because she was getting cast in some solid stuff for awhile before the Tom Cruise clusterfuck, but she was easily the weakest link on Dawson's Creek. She had a breathy, flat voice and one facial expression: Annoyed smirk. Since then she had added 2 other expressions: blank stare and wide eyes.
|
|
|
Post by smitten on Dec 6, 2015 3:22:09 GMT -4
She was always really bad. I never got why profile writers or directors or even critics were gushing about her. She's not a good actress. She's very stuff, awkward, and unnatural. Like, HS theater production/child star in a Hallmark film bad. I guess she is doing something right for the people who are fans, because she was getting cast in some solid stuff for awhile before the Tom Cruise clusterfuck, but she was easily the weakest link on Dawson's Creek. She had a breathy, flat voice and one facial expression: Annoyed smirk. Since then she had added 2 other expressions: blank stare and wide eyes. True, but she was good/expressive with Pacey. Cuz Josh Jackson makes everything better. It's a rule. Even Anna Torv followed it after the first few episodes.
|
|