|
Post by discoprincess on Jul 9, 2014 10:44:43 GMT -4
On the Wendy Williams Show, Wendy mentioned how J. Lo apparently remixed her infamous Grammy dress to a jumpsuit for the "I Luh Ya Papi" video. Her vocals admittedly aren't the best, but now that song has converted itself into an earworm. That said, the song and the video concept seem like something circa 2002.
|
|
|
Post by Coffeecakes on Jul 9, 2014 20:27:57 GMT -4
That I Luv ya papi song is horrible. Kimmel had her there to translate what the lyrics mean and jesus, just ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by FotoStoreSheila on Jul 9, 2014 20:34:05 GMT -4
That I Luv ya papi song is horrible. Kimmel had her there to translate what the lyrics mean and jesus, just ridiculous. You think that one's bad? 'Booty' is hot garbage.
|
|
honee
Landed Gentry
Posts: 630
Feb 14, 2007 15:11:50 GMT -4
|
Post by honee on Jul 9, 2014 23:03:58 GMT -4
That I Luv ya papi song is horrible. Kimmel had her there to translate what the lyrics mean and jesus, just ridiculous. You think that one's bad? 'Booty' is hot garbage. Booty is suppose to be the song that saves the album. The whole cd is H.A.M. . That's nothing new but this time she tried to make an album without auto-tune and ghost singers and it sounds a horrible mess. I wonder what the Viola Davis movie outcome will be for her acting career.
|
|
iClaudia
Sloane Ranger
"When love and duty are one, grace is within you."
Posts: 2,215
Mar 13, 2005 14:33:41 GMT -4
|
Post by iClaudia on Jul 9, 2014 23:35:34 GMT -4
On the Wendy Williams Show, Wendy mentioned how J. Lo apparently remixed her infamous Grammy dress to a jumpsuit for the "I Luh Ya Papi" video. Her vocals admittedly aren't the best, but now that song has converted itself into an earworm. That said, the song and the video concept seem like something circa 2002. At least she had some catchy songs circa 2001-2002 (Affleck video butt kissing, notwithstanding). This one would have been a bust then, too. As bad as the song is, I must say that she looks really beautiful in the scenes on the couch at the beginning of the video.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 22:25:09 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 14:53:31 GMT -4
Unfortunately, I think current artists are utilizing the "Kardashian Rules of Kareer Success": The quantity not the quality of the product is all that matters. Constantly churn out sidewalk fashion shows, selfies, half naked or completely naked pics, instagram, blog, vine, facebook, tweet and whatever all the time and it sure "seems" like you're successful! The only thing that matters is that they keep putting out product to keep the attention. All that explains J-Los, Madonna's and Lady Gaga's very poor music lately. It also explains the "success" of a Rita Ora or a Miley Cyrus. It easy to "get lazy" when you get the cover of a magazine, perfume deals, adoration with out much work to show for it because you fucked someone famous or because your PR team can crank up the machine. Don't get me wrong I know entertainers have always been "commodites" but they still put out good product because they needed to sell their music to be deemed a success. Not now.
|
|
|
Post by discoprincess on Jul 10, 2014 15:40:17 GMT -4
On the Wendy Williams Show, Wendy mentioned how J. Lo apparently remixed her infamous Grammy dress to a jumpsuit for the "I Luh Ya Papi" video. Her vocals admittedly aren't the best, but now that song has converted itself into an earworm. That said, the song and the video concept seem like something circa 2002. At least she had some catchy songs circa 2001-2002 (Affleck video butt kissing, notwithstanding). This one would have been a bust then, too. Maybe not if Puffy were doing the rap! She does look good for her age. Seriously, it looks as if she hasn't aged a bit. ETA: Today J. Lo posted a selfie with the First Lady.
|
|
honee
Landed Gentry
Posts: 630
Feb 14, 2007 15:11:50 GMT -4
|
Post by honee on Jul 10, 2014 16:28:35 GMT -4
Unfortunately, I think current artists are utilizing the "Kardashian Rules of Kareer Success": The quantity not the quality of the product is all that matters. Constantly churn out sidewalk fashion shows, selfies, half naked or completely naked pics, instagram, blog, vine, facebook, tweet and whatever all the time and it sure "seems" like you're successful! The only thing that matters is that they keep putting out product to keep the attention. All that explains J-Los, Madonna's and Lady Gaga's very poor music lately. It also explains the "success" of a Rita Ora or a Miley Cyrus. It easy to "get lazy" when you get the cover of a magazine, perfume deals, adoration with out much work to show for it because you fucked someone famous or because your PR team can crank up the machine. Don't get me wrong I know entertainers have always been "commodites" but they still put out good product because they needed to sell their music to be deemed a success. Not now. I would agree with this except for the fact that Jennifer is the creator of this form of success. That's why it was laughable when she compared herself to Mariah. She managed to squeak out a few hits in the past with a lot of heavy lifting from other people. Benny Medina has always been the mastermind behind her career/image. Now there are just too many younger people that fit into the same category for to get any footing.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 22:25:09 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2014 21:15:13 GMT -4
I agree. Lopez has always been more image than substance.
|
|
|
Post by Coffeecakes on Jul 10, 2014 23:53:57 GMT -4
Unfortunately, I think current artists are utilizing the "Kardashian Rules of Kareer Success": The quantity not the quality of the product is all that matters. Constantly churn out sidewalk fashion shows, selfies, half naked or completely naked pics, instagram, blog, vine, facebook, tweet and whatever all the time and it sure "seems" like you're successful! The only thing that matters is that they keep putting out product to keep the attention. All that explains J-Los, Madonna's and Lady Gaga's very poor music lately. It also explains the "success" of a Rita Ora or a Miley Cyrus. It easy to "get lazy" when you get the cover of a magazine, perfume deals, adoration with out much work to show for it because you fucked someone famous or because your PR team can crank up the machine. Don't get me wrong I know entertainers have always been "commodites" but they still put out good product because they needed to sell their music to be deemed a success. Not now. I would agree with this except for the fact that Jennifer is the creator of this form of success. That's why it was laughable when she compared herself to Mariah. She managed to squeak out a few hits in the past with a lot of heavy lifting from other people. Benny Medina has always been the mastermind behind her career/image. Now there are just too many younger people that fit into the same category for to get any footing. Excuse me but no. I have always thought she has modeled her career after the true originator Krusty the Clown. Now that is an entrepeneur.
|
|