|
Post by Yossarian on Sept 20, 2006 20:28:22 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 3:19:47 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2006 4:22:27 GMT -4
So I guess we all can look forward to looking like The Joker by age 40?
|
|
|
Post by Auroranorth on Sept 21, 2006 9:18:14 GMT -4
That first photo is so uncomfortable to look at. I keep expecting the cops to come bursting in.
|
|
nuharoo
Guest
Apr 24, 2024 3:19:47 GMT -4
|
Post by nuharoo on Sept 21, 2006 12:39:28 GMT -4
That is just too wrong. I just looked at those photos and while I think it's cute, there are other people out there who are thinking a lot worse things.
|
|
fairfox
Guest
Apr 24, 2024 3:19:47 GMT -4
|
Post by fairfox on Sept 21, 2006 14:48:04 GMT -4
My problem with those photos is that they seem overtly sexualized. I've seen many a naked kid/baby photo and they're 100% innocent, but that lower-back-tattoo one combined with the toplessness and the come-hither-ish facial expression (yuck) as well as the string bikini one - those are tasteless, to say the least.
And nice try on the denial Cindy, but it's literally all over your face.
|
|
cocobean
Landed Gentry
Posts: 757
Apr 4, 2006 9:47:25 GMT -4
|
Post by cocobean on Sept 21, 2006 14:55:53 GMT -4
I really want to see her answer to these photos. That one in particular needs an explanation (not that there is one).
|
|
Margo
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,224
Apr 10, 2005 22:46:06 GMT -4
|
Post by Margo on Sept 21, 2006 18:04:56 GMT -4
I, personally, don't see anything terribly wrong with those photos. As in, I wouldn't feel bad about them if a family friend showed me these photos of her kids. But with Cindy being a celebrity, she should know better than make them public. I cannot imagine a fairly intelligent mother looking at those pictures of her kids and not seeing what pedophiles will think about them, and anticipating the reaction of the public to them.
|
|
niddlemiddle
Guest
Apr 24, 2024 3:19:47 GMT -4
|
Post by niddlemiddle on Sept 21, 2006 18:30:20 GMT -4
The photos skeeve me out, especially the top one.
Those photos make me realize how... in choosing to make a living out of being a model, she's probably lost touch about objectifying. It's just built in to the entire modeling industry. Why would she feel that's wrong?... it's all she's known. I'm sure she feels that photos are pretty and isn't her daughter gorgeous.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Sept 21, 2006 19:13:36 GMT -4
Those photos make me realize how... in choosing to make a living out of being a model, she's probably lost touch about objectifying. It's just built in to the entire modeling industry. Why would she feel that's wrong?... it's all she's known. I think that's a really good point. Of course, that doesn't ameloriate the fact that she made the decision to pimp out her daughter that way but it goes a long way to explaining her motives. I honestly think that the modelling industry destroys women's self-imagery (both within the actual industry and the effects that flow on to the general community). These women are plucked from obscurity in their teens, sent to places like Milan where men like Flavio Brittore (sp?) pick over them and assess them as if they were cows at a cattle call, and the rest of their career is nothing but looks, looks, looks. The people who hire them give them work for their looks; the celebrity they get is based on their appearance; the men they date prize them for their arm candy quotient. No wonder Cindy - who's supposed to be the "smart supermodel" - can't see anything inappropriate in stressing the importance of physical appearance and appeal to men to her daughter. Sad, really.
|
|
spider
Guest
Apr 24, 2024 3:19:47 GMT -4
|
Post by spider on Sept 21, 2006 22:27:47 GMT -4
I always wore a bikini, often just the bottoms. I didn't start to wear the top until I was probably 8 or so.
|
|