ivy
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 8:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by ivy on May 26, 2008 15:56:21 GMT -4
Geena Davis was pratically naked at the Emmys about five years ago. You could see her pubic hair through her dress. That was really gross. I remember them calling her "Va-Geena" on FT.
Anyone who wears those gun-shoes should also wear a t-shirt saying "I am one of those fools who thinks all expensive things are beautiful even if they are ugly".
|
|
|
|
Post by batmom on May 26, 2008 16:37:12 GMT -4
Anyone who wears those gun-shoes should also wear a t-shirt saying "I am one of those fools who thinks all expensive things are beautiful even if they are ugly". Or how about: " Bang! Another fashion victim." |
|
SluttyMary
Blueblood
Posts: 1,205
Oct 20, 2005 9:16:30 GMT -4
|
Post by SluttyMary on May 26, 2008 18:09:05 GMT -4
Geena Davis was pratically naked at the Emmys about five years ago. You could see her pubic hair through her dress. That was really gross. I remember them calling her "Va-Geena" on FT. Does anybody have a picture?  |
|
topwesselton
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 8:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by topwesselton on May 26, 2008 18:47:21 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by SweetOblivion on May 26, 2008 22:34:53 GMT -4
Who will be the first celeb to just show up at an event totally nekkid except for heels? Does this count? ( semi-NSFW. Not completely nude, but ...  ) |
|
topwesselton
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 8:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by topwesselton on May 26, 2008 22:59:04 GMT -4
Who is that and WHY?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 8:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2008 22:59:10 GMT -4
Miss FHM gave it a mighty try there, but no, I'm looking for full birthday suit. She does, however, indicate that the time is nigh for such a display. I predict there'll be some body paint and glitter, maybe rhinestones glued on. And afterwards a statement like "I don't understand why there was such a fuss! What's wrong with people?!"
|
|
|
|
Post by lpatrice on May 27, 2008 0:43:23 GMT -4
Geena Davis was pratically naked at the Emmys about five years ago. You could see her pubic hair through her dress. That was really gross. I remember them calling her "Va-Geena" on FT. Anyone who wears those gun-shoes should also wear a t-shirt saying "I am one of those fools who thinks all expensive things are beautiful even if they are ugly". I thought that was the outline to her panties. And actually she was pretty much covered from head to toe. Whatever the case, it was a bad choice but I think it was more of a oops didn't realize what would happen when the light hit the dress, as opposed to a Stephanie Seymour. |
|
|
|
Post by SweetOblivion on May 27, 2008 10:21:11 GMT -4
|
|
ivy
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 8:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by ivy on May 27, 2008 16:33:12 GMT -4
I thought that was the outline to her panties. And actually she was pretty much covered from head to toe. Whatever the case, it was a bad choice but I think it was more of a oops didn't realize what would happen when the light hit the dress, as opposed to a Stephanie Seymour. Nyah, it wasn't an oops. I remember Geena huffily telling a magazine afterwards, "Of course I knew that dress was see-through!" when they insinuated she didn't. I could never figure out why the Oscars only shot J.Lo from the shoulders up that year when you could see the outline of her nipples, but they didn't have a problem with Geena's entire boobs being exposed through very light fabric at the Emmys. Jane Leeves once wore a ridiculous "outfit" at some awards show where she had a scarf around her neck and hanging over her breasts, with nothing underneath, but nobody cared because she's not very famous. I still remember it though, because it was so very desperate-looking and stupid. |
|
)