|
Ugly
Aug 13, 2007 16:34:39 GMT -4
Post by Augustus on Aug 13, 2007 16:34:39 GMT -4
Ugh, great. Another great candy that gets all the bad associations.
|
|
petals
Guest
Oct 2, 2024 22:41:33 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 14, 2007 18:29:52 GMT -4
Post by petals on Aug 14, 2007 18:29:52 GMT -4
I don't know where else to put this. I got it from d-listed so I apologize if you've seen it before. No one's really ugly it's just a little fun. ETA: Wow, some of those ladies are so thin that they had to add weight to them. I thought if that was ever done then Hollywood would implode or something.
|
|
footballerswife
Guest
Oct 2, 2024 22:41:33 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 14, 2007 18:35:04 GMT -4
Post by footballerswife on Aug 14, 2007 18:35:04 GMT -4
Thanks for that link Petals. I looove looking at stuff like that-- it makes me feel so much better about myself!
|
|
tinyshoes
Guest
Oct 2, 2024 22:41:33 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 14, 2007 19:06:41 GMT -4
Post by tinyshoes on Aug 14, 2007 19:06:41 GMT -4
Although Halle Berry hardly needed any retouching. Snot fair!
|
|
esoterica
Sloane Ranger
kittie crapped a faerie!
Posts: 2,389
Jan 12, 2006 18:36:53 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 14, 2007 19:22:03 GMT -4
Post by esoterica on Aug 14, 2007 19:22:03 GMT -4
Waah! It won't work for me!
|
|
strawberrylover
Guest
Oct 2, 2024 22:41:33 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 14, 2007 20:38:53 GMT -4
Post by strawberrylover on Aug 14, 2007 20:38:53 GMT -4
I don't know where else to put this. I got it from d-listed so I apologize if you've seen it before. Holy...! I had never seen that before. Okay question: What the HELL are the photographers and makeup artists doing if these celebs are looking so washed out and lit with horrible lighting in the original photographs? Like the Kelly Clarkson original photo looks like she didn't even have any makeup on. They had to digitally ADD makeup to her? That sucks.
|
|
|
Ugly
Aug 15, 2007 7:27:46 GMT -4
Post by Augustus on Aug 15, 2007 7:27:46 GMT -4
I thought it was interesting how on some the skinnier women they added meat on their bones. And that site (amongst a few out there, can't remember the URLs) just proves my point when I say that the ideal image only exists on the harddrive of some computer, not in reality.
|
|
|
Ugly
Aug 15, 2007 14:50:32 GMT -4
Post by LurkerNan on Aug 15, 2007 14:50:32 GMT -4
I feel better knowing all these starlets have to have their waists nipped in and their cleavage enhanced.
|
|
nadia
Guest
Oct 2, 2024 22:41:33 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 15, 2007 15:13:01 GMT -4
Post by nadia on Aug 15, 2007 15:13:01 GMT -4
Wow, that shows just how unremarkable most celebs really look. Halle, Penelope, Cate Blanchette (that was her right), Naomi Watts and the last girl who had her freckles airbrushed out were really the only people I'd really call naturally beautiful. Julia Stiles' and Kelly Clarkson's before and afters didn't look too different. The others weren't ugly but they're not stunners either. Cameron looked like Viggo Mortensen in the before pic, and Eva Longoria looked like an aging hooker.
|
|
crankykate
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 131
Jul 20, 2006 9:26:59 GMT -4
|
Ugly
Aug 15, 2007 15:45:33 GMT -4
Post by crankykate on Aug 15, 2007 15:45:33 GMT -4
That site was eye-opening. I've always considered Matthew Macfadyen the most average-looking of men (insanely talented, though, and MY GOD THAT VOICE), and the picture on that site seals it for me. I actually thought Connie Nielsen's "before" picture was stunning, but her "after" picture looked like she was made out of plastic. And was that Brittany Murphy? Goodness, but she looked tired.
|
|