Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 1, 2024 5:38:03 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2007 21:28:10 GMT -4
I vote yay if it means that Simone will stop appearing on celebrity reality tv shows. I'm with you there. The cynic in me suggests they weren't really broken up in the first place - he was still living in their home, and every week one or the other of them was on the cover of New Idea or Womens' Weekly. It was probably just a publicity stunt to get Simone's 'career' off the ground. They're a pair of bleached blonde not-too-bright-bogans who deserve each other (although Warnie is my embarrassing celebrity crush), I hope those crazy kids make it.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jan 29, 2007 22:10:57 GMT -4
They're a pair of bleached blonde not-too-bright-bogans who deserve each other (although Warnie is my embarrassing celebrity crush), I hope those crazy kids make it. Another Warney crush on these boards? Ah, go sit in the corner 'o shame with fairfox! But yes, they are two bogans who deserve each other. I mean, if Simone wasn't with Shane then she'd just be with some other boofy tool with tipped hair and he'd just be with some long suffering blonde who looks the other way while spending his money at Jacqui E. They might as well stay together.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 1, 2024 5:38:03 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2007 23:26:12 GMT -4
Nay. Anything that brings them more attention is a bad thing. I'm so sick of seeing her and hearing about them. On my desk is currently Woman's Day with headline "Shane Proposes. Marry me again! Kisses and public passion on their second honeymoon in Fiji,"and New Idea with "Shane & Simone's steamy second honeymoon." Honestly who cares? Go away! Isn't it bad enough that the cricket is stealing all the tv slots without clogging up the weeklies too?
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jan 30, 2007 0:57:25 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 1, 2024 5:38:03 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2007 21:32:16 GMT -4
Wow, I didn't know it was possible to dislike Matthew Newton more than I already did. But it is.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jan 30, 2007 21:37:00 GMT -4
Brooke has twelve witnesses appearing for her. Matthew has four. There were two incidents that the police attended where they verified Brooke's version of events. Why is he even pleading not guilty? Unless, like daddy, he doesn't realise that it's illegal to bash your partner.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 1, 2024 5:38:03 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2007 21:42:35 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jan 30, 2007 21:44:29 GMT -4
|
|
fairfox
Guest
Oct 1, 2024 5:38:03 GMT -4
|
Post by fairfox on Jan 31, 2007 0:27:46 GMT -4
Hey now, I told you that crush died the moment I finished reading that quote/'apology' to his wife whereby he managed to basically assure her he'd do it again, and be sorry for it then, too. Yuck. No Shane Warne love from me anymore. There's nothing worse than a responsibility-dodging male.
|
|
GinFizz
Blueblood
Posts: 1,174
Mar 21, 2005 11:25:50 GMT -4
|
Post by GinFizz on Jan 31, 2007 15:46:00 GMT -4
Unless, like daddy, he doesn't realise that it's illegal to bash your partner. Whaaa?? Has Bert been going the biff with Patti? Or did he just say something boneheaded about Matthew's charges?
|
|