|
Post by mrspickles on May 16, 2015 21:57:35 GMT -4
The Jackie Kennedy movie may want to be Oscar baity, but none of the depictions of Jackie Kennedy I've seen (usually in TV movies) have been anything other than silly garbage. Katie Holmes has already been there and done that. This is being produced by Darren Aronofsky. Last I heard he was trying to produce another movie for Natalie, but Steven Spielberg and Jennifer Lawrence are now attached. I could understand why he would direct her in another movie, but I don't quite understand why he seems to want to be her personal production company. Wasn't it rumored that he's the real father of her son, and she married the ballet dancer to cover it up? Yes! I knew there was something that had made the rounds, but I couldn't remember, and that was the story.
|
|
|
Post by mochakitty on May 16, 2015 22:03:22 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on May 16, 2015 22:17:29 GMT -4
I don't know what it is, but she has been looking older lately. I think... there's a new fragility to her skin or something that is making me see her that way? Anyway, she's still beautiful, but something has changed about her appearance. Not bad, but different. And not in a plastic surgery kind of way.
|
|
|
Post by Ninja Bunny on May 16, 2015 23:17:38 GMT -4
Her eyebrows are scary.
|
|
luminosa
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,431
Dec 16, 2008 12:12:11 GMT -4
|
Post by luminosa on May 17, 2015 8:04:03 GMT -4
The Jackie movie I feel will go the way of Nicole Kidman's Grace movie and Naomi Watt's Princess Di movie. Aka nowhere.
|
|
|
Post by bklynred on May 17, 2015 8:29:59 GMT -4
Pretty dress. She looks emaciated. That's all I got.
|
|
|
Post by divasahm on May 17, 2015 9:01:26 GMT -4
I wonder if the change in her look is from post-pregnancy weight loss. Some of the celebrities who've lost all the baby weight in a really short time frame look haggard and exhausted beyond the normal stress of new parenthood.
|
|
gremlin45
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,136
Dec 9, 2008 19:29:13 GMT -4
|
Post by gremlin45 on May 17, 2015 9:49:29 GMT -4
I don't know what it is, but she has been looking older lately. I think... there's a new fragility to her skin or something that is making me see her that way? Anyway, she's still beautiful, but something has changed about her appearance. Not bad, but different. And not in a plastic surgery kind of way. It looks to me like she's got lots of lines around her eyes that weren't there a year or two ago. Her face definitely looks different somehow.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Dec 1, 2024 8:39:50 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2015 11:15:32 GMT -4
She's in her mid-thirties and she's very skinny, so I don't think the lines around her face, the slight neck sag, or the few gray hairs I see are anything all that surprising. What's interesting about her though is that she looked younger than her age for so long, now that she actually does look her age we all (myself included) think, "Whoa...what happened?"
|
|
atwood
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 131
May 20, 2007 8:08:52 GMT -4
|
Post by atwood on May 17, 2015 14:52:12 GMT -4
Yes, that's exactly it. I've seen this happen with a few of my relatives, and I'm going through it myself right now. I'm in my mid-thirties, and up until last year I still looked about twenty. This is pretty much the first year of my life where I don't get agressively (as in checks the ID, checks me out, goes back and checks the ID, checks me out, gets asked when my birthday is and what year I'm born...) carded for things with an 18 year old age limit, because I finally look unmistakably older. That's true for most people, no matter how young they've looked before eventually start looking their own age. I don't think she at all looks old for her age, and she looks great. She just looks old compared to her previously girlish looks.
|
|