|
Post by Neurochick on Sept 26, 2008 11:00:46 GMT -4
I think Clay appeals to women and men who are really afraid of sex. That's why they see Clay as attractive. Me, I'd never want to see him naked. Gross!
|
|
|
Post by discoprincess on Sept 26, 2008 14:15:23 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by kostgard on Sept 26, 2008 15:11:42 GMT -4
I wouldn't've said "hot" or "sexy," but I thought his whole geeky-boy thing when I first saw him on AI was cute as a button. I sure as hell didn't ever picture him naked, though! That is how I felt when he first popped up on AI. He seemed geeky-cute and had that southern boy politeness, so I thought he was adorable in that you-want-to-pat-him-on-the-head-and-put-him-in-your-pocket kind of way. At no time did I think of him as "sexy." And that's the part I don't get - the Claymate's running around with the "Clay makes my ovaries quake" t-shirts. I mean...really? Him?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2008 15:44:48 GMT -4
Then their ovaries quaking for The Jonas Brothers and their purity rings would make more sense to me than Clay. At least The Jonas Brothers, though they're not my cup of tea, have some kind of physical attractiveness (sort of....I mean, I guess if I were 15 I would probably think they were decent-looking enough). And they have advertised that they're not doing it till marriage. So you get your one-two combo in those dudes (no sex plus a little bit of cute looks).
Clay has a strange look to him which is probably why I can't figure out how people are attracted to him even if they are afraid of sex. I guess Zac Efron would also make more sense to me in that kind of scenario. If these fans are afraid of sex then wouldn't it make more sense to pick someone who doesn't creep the rest of the population out? If he's creeping out people who aren't afraid of having sex then shouldn't he creep out the ones who don't want to do it even more? How are they picking the one guy to fantasize about who gives everyone else the willies (at least from a sexual perspective)? Again, Clay, what?
|
|
thesurlymermaid
Guest
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by thesurlymermaid on Sept 26, 2008 20:24:03 GMT -4
I think they are more turned on by his singing. Like Mick Jagger is the ugliest thing ever but he gets laid for the rock star charisma thing. Well, for these women, it's Clay.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2008 20:35:18 GMT -4
I think they are more turned on by his singing. Like Mick Jagger is the ugliest thing ever but he gets laid for the rock star charisma thing. Well, for these women, it's Clay. This is the best analogy, like, ever!!!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2008 21:30:04 GMT -4
I think they are more turned on by his singing. Like Mick Jagger is the ugliest thing ever but he gets laid for the rock star charisma thing. Well, for these women, it's Clay. Okay this analogy does make sense. I guess Clay's voice is some kind of potent aphrodisiac for these women then. Still.....they have to look at that face in their fantasies. Although Mick Jagger is ugly at least his face doesn't give me the heebie-jeebies.
|
|
footballerswife
Guest
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by footballerswife on Sept 26, 2008 21:38:46 GMT -4
But.. Mick Jagger is ugly-sexy. Clay is just ugly.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:56 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2008 21:42:39 GMT -4
But.. Mick Jagger is ugly-sexy. Clay is just ugly. Yeah, you're right. That thought crossed my mind too.
|
|
RabbitEars
Landed Gentry
Posts: 662
Mar 12, 2005 16:27:29 GMT -4
|
Post by RabbitEars on Sept 26, 2008 21:56:22 GMT -4
People were also shocked with kd lang came out. Some people just really, truley have no clue. Yeah, I remember that. She had been at an LBTG event at my college the year before she came out, and it was like, "Really? She wasn't out?"
|
|