Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2005 11:33:30 GMT -4
I thought the kiss between her and Ryan at the MTV Awards was sort of awkward. Like, spit your gum out, Ryan and act like you aren't waiting until you are off-stage to wipe your mouth with the back of your sleeve. It made me doubt the rumors about them dating. I guess they are and a less than sexy kiss doesn't mean anything (especially if you take into consideration the location and the nature of the kiss) but I think they are both hot and found the MTV kiss to be... not.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2005 11:40:13 GMT -4
Wait - he and Britney had sex? Say it ain't so!
I like Rachel McAdams a lot - I think she's a great actress and very cute.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2005 12:38:27 GMT -4
Yeah, they're dating. I remember seeing pics on Pink is the New blog or something like that of them. Shopping for groceries and giving each other kisses. So cute. On topic, I think she's great. I think I found the pics here. Eta: Another pic.
|
|
oxygen1234
Landed Gentry
Posts: 554
Sept 6, 2005 18:24:45 GMT -4
|
Post by oxygen1234 on Nov 14, 2005 13:43:35 GMT -4
According to the imdb she's 29 but the Allure article claims she's 25. I have to wonder if the writer was lazy or if Rachel's still trying to shave a few years off of her age. (About a year ago some of the American publications like EW said she was 25.)
|
|
Maddiemoo
Landed Gentry
Assistant (to the) Regional Manager
Posts: 957
Mar 7, 2005 20:45:36 GMT -4
|
Post by Maddiemoo on Nov 14, 2005 15:19:59 GMT -4
Love her. She's adorable and could have chemistry with a stick. I kept wanting her and Cillian Murphy to make out all through Red Eye.
|
|
beeler
Guest
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by beeler on Nov 21, 2005 18:31:14 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Wol on Nov 21, 2005 18:37:49 GMT -4
Go Fug Yourself better not see those. They'll have a field day.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2005 3:40:54 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2005 4:23:24 GMT -4
That nude walk off sounds like a nice bit of spin. I mean, I like Rachel and everything and think that if she is uncomfortable with the idea she shouldn't do it, but it isn't like Vanity Fair is Playboy or even Maxim or something. VF has featured some pseudo nudity (like the Jennifer Aniston in a waterfall picture from their Hollywood issue a few years ago) but it isn't like Rachel would be getting the goods out for all and sundry to see.
It sounds like this might be the cover for Vanity Fair's annual Hollywood Issue. My guess is that she either pulled a Natalie Portman and said she wanted to be IN the magazine not on its cover only, she wasn't pleased at having to pose with other women (the article mentions ScarJo and Keira Knightley) or she found out she was going to be on an inside flap and wanted a cover position. So, she decides not to do it and her publicist spins it in this very "girl power!" way - like she has scruples and a backbone because she refused to do a nude photoshoot (that probably wasn't really nude anyway).
I don't know. I agree that her past nudity doesn't really have anything to do with it. If she isn't comfortable, she isn't comfortable (and who is to say she was happy doing the nudity the first time around?) and shouldn't be made to pose.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 26, 2024 20:10:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2005 4:27:48 GMT -4
Well, she DID fire her publicist immediately after. That makes me think she was VERY upset about something. Maybe she's just a snitty bitch and fired her publicist because the publicist told Rachel she would be IN the mag and not just on the cover. I guess that's possible. But I haven't heard much about her being an egomaniacal bitch.
|
|