|
Post by americanchai on Feb 8, 2006 21:44:07 GMT -4
I HATE him. I don't understand where his arrogance comes from. Balding, fake-tanned guys who cannot button their shirts do nothing for me. In fact, if he did to me what he's doing to Keira on the VF cover at a club, I'd probably slap the shit out of him.
In that W article he is purported to be bisexual. I have nothing against his sexual identity or the idea of being a sexual persona, but he's really trying to sell to the world that he's the ultimate sex god, sex on legs, sex in a perfume, sex in your moisturizer. He's NOT!
|
|
|
Post by satellite on Feb 9, 2006 10:07:17 GMT -4
Yes, but with a slightly gay affectation.
|
|
Foo
Landed Gentry
Posts: 976
Mar 6, 2005 18:58:09 GMT -4
|
Post by Foo on Feb 24, 2006 4:57:06 GMT -4
I was pleased with the Hollywood issue and thought Tom did a good job. If you thought SJ and KK on the cover were showing too much, then you obviously didn't see some of the other profiles. Sienna Miller is in nothing but panties, flashing her tits, and Joy Bryant is full frontal with some bling on her wrist slightly covering her privates. The George Clooney pic was awesome.
Reading the article that accopanied the article, I appreciated Tom's vision for the issue. He said he didn't want anymore of those tired, Victorian family portraits, and wanted to get a little more European and experimental, especially with the showing of the naked body. It may not have been a success in all fronts, but I respect the idea and welcome the change.
|
|
slashgirl
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 1:54:39 GMT -4
|
Post by slashgirl on Feb 24, 2006 12:33:08 GMT -4
I was pleased with the Hollywood issue and thought Tom did a good job. If you thought SJ and KK on the cover were showing too much, then you obviously didn't see some of the other profiles. Sienna Miller is in nothing but panties, flashing her tits, and Joy Bryant is full frontal with some bling on her wrist slightly covering her privates. The George Clooney pic was awesome. Reading the article that accopanied the article, I appreciated Tom's vision for the issue. He said he didn't want anymore of those tired, Victorian family portraits, and wanted to get a little more European and experimental, especially with the showing of the naked body. It may not have been a success in all fronts, but I respect the idea and welcome the change. I don't. I'm no prude by any means, but I would've had no problem with TF's willingness to experiment if he'd included some hot nekkid men, for equal time, in respect to VF's female readers, many of whom aren't interested in female nudity, myself included. After this issue, I hate TF so much I hope that VF never even features his clothes again, let alone him.
|
|