|
|
Post by divasahm on May 12, 2013 15:32:24 GMT -4
The same thing happened to Leonardo DiCaprio. Weird. I think it's an optical illusion. Their features appear to be closer together because there's so much empty face surrounding them. Around here, we call that syndrome "too much head, not enough face"... |
|
Wenton
Blueblood
Posts: 1,348
Nov 22, 2005 16:48:38 GMT -4
|
Post by Wenton on May 12, 2013 18:50:22 GMT -4
I've just been calling it "DiCaprio Forehead" when a guy has a young looking face but his head is aging quickly. Justin Timberlake is getting a touch of it, too.
|
|
sueli
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 474
Mar 18, 2005 2:14:16 GMT -4
|
Post by sueli on May 12, 2013 23:18:12 GMT -4
The same thing happened to Leonardo DiCaprio. Weird. I think it's an optical illusion. Their features appear to be closer together because there's so much empty face surrounding them. All I think of is Wings' "Antonio Scarpacci" and his girlfriend with the big moon face ('around her face is more face') |
|
hamhock
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,333
Sept 5, 2005 16:30:07 GMT -4
|
Post by hamhock on May 13, 2013 8:02:31 GMT -4
Anne Hathaway has the opposite of that....too much face, not enough head. They (she and Leonardo) should switch features.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrsOldManBalls on May 13, 2013 8:23:36 GMT -4
Anne Hathaway has the opposite of that....too much face, not enough head. They (she and Leonardo) should switch features. Someone needs to photoshop this! |
|
gremlin45
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,136
Dec 9, 2008 19:29:13 GMT -4
|
Post by gremlin45 on May 13, 2013 8:38:45 GMT -4
Anne Hathaway has the opposite of that....too much face, not enough head. They (she and Leonardo) should switch features. Someone needs to photoshop this! That was exactly what I thought! |
|
|
|
Post by kanding on May 16, 2013 5:47:47 GMT -4
Anne Hathaway has the opposite of that....too much face, not enough head. They (she and Leonardo) should switch features. You know, I always thought that Penelope Cruz had a touch of that. At least her husband has the features to support his ginormous (but gorgeous) head. |
|
|
|
Post by Babycakes on Apr 18, 2014 16:09:03 GMT -4
Maybe this should be in the Celebrity Endowments thread, but... Although I don't watch Mad Men, I thought Jon Hamm was hysterical and charming on 30 Rock and SNL. He's also very handsome, in a traditional kind of way. I just don't think his cock is as big as people claim it is. The term Hammaconda is nonsensical. He's average. He just doesn't wear underwear, and people are aware of his johnson. Maybe I've been spoiled IRL, but he's catalog material, not pornstar material.  ETA: To be even more controversial, I don't get the appeal of Joshua Jackson. I don't think he's as handsome, or charming as people have made him out to be. I don't think he's the "ideal boyfriend". He was annoying as Pacey, and I think he has Dicaprio disease: Big ass little boy head, on grown man body. {ducks for cover} |
|
|
|
Post by chonies on Apr 18, 2014 16:45:25 GMT -4
The way I see it, people are very aware of the average-or-greater genitals of a handsome man, so perhaps it's 'whole is greater than the sum of its parts' situation.
And joining you on the Joshua Jackson list--he's not appealing, and I have no nostalgic or cerebral attachment to his work. My vet has similar features and is more attractive.
|
|
jmc
Blueblood
Posts: 1,091
Feb 10, 2007 13:52:28 GMT -4
|
Post by jmc on Apr 18, 2014 18:36:07 GMT -4
Joshua Jackson was cute in a "hey, he's young" kind of way, but his face sort of became all doughy and unremarkable when he started aging. On the other hand, I think Van Der Beek has gotten better looking with age. Never thought JVDB was that good looking on Dawson's Creek.
|
|
