kali
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,446
Jul 1, 2008 23:07:20 GMT -4
|
Post by kali on Jan 5, 2009 19:29:02 GMT -4
Am I just hoping in vain for Rosalie to be recast? I found Nikki Reed SO distracting in Twilight. With the bleached hair and pancake makeup, she looked like one of the White Chicks. THAT is not the most beautiful girl in the world.
|
|
tamaradixon
Guest
Oct 11, 2024 17:55:14 GMT -4
|
Post by tamaradixon on Jan 5, 2009 19:43:00 GMT -4
Am I just hoping in vain for Rosalie to be recast? I found Nikki Reed SO distracting in Twilight. With the bleached hair and pancake makeup, she looked like one of the White Chicks. THAT is not the most beautiful girl in the world. THAT's exactly what she looked like. I was trying to place it for months now and that is IT!
|
|
|
Post by scarlet on Jan 6, 2009 1:32:01 GMT -4
OMG, that is the perfect comparison!
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jan 6, 2009 10:24:28 GMT -4
Am I just hoping in vain for Rosalie to be recast? Probably. But I'm right there with you.
|
|
|
Post by bitca on Jan 6, 2009 15:35:19 GMT -4
She has such a small part (until Breaking Dawn - which I doubt they'll make, the main cast is only signed on for three movies, right?) that she doesn't bother me. Out of all the fake hair, her's looked the best, I think.
|
|
kali
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,446
Jul 1, 2008 23:07:20 GMT -4
|
Post by kali on Jan 6, 2009 19:43:15 GMT -4
I thought that was her real hair. She was rocking some nasty roots in any event.
I actually remember Rosalie having kind of a big role in Eclipse too, when she tells her big history, 3/4 of which is reiterating how absolutely, stunningly beautiful she was. The thought of Nikki Reed doing that just irks me.
|
|
|
Post by bitca on Jan 6, 2009 20:19:41 GMT -4
Oh, yeah. She did. But, I bet since Hardwicke's out, they'll probably cut that mess out or make it a footnote. I mean, it explains why she's so bitchy, but it doesn't really impact the story all that much.
|
|
|
Post by scarlet on Jan 6, 2009 20:29:43 GMT -4
Oh, yeah. She did. But, I bet since Hardwicke's out, they'll probably cut that mess out or make it a footnote. I mean, it explains why she's so bitchy, but it doesn't really impact the story all that much. Yeah, Eclipse is a huge book with tons of story and that is really unimportant in the grand scheme of things.
|
|
kali
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,446
Jul 1, 2008 23:07:20 GMT -4
|
Post by kali on Jan 6, 2009 20:46:59 GMT -4
I really do wonder how they'll tackle the backstories. I know some of the fans LOVE them, but I'll admit, I skim, skim, skim over Rosalie being raped and beaten (Was she raped? Yeah, skimmed it.), Jasper and the Civil War, Carlisle and his whole deal with the Volterra. Considering how shitty the sepia-toned flashbacks were in Twilight, I can't see them spending time on this stuff in future installments. Although, I suppose if they were set pieces, they'd put in some effort and not shoot them on the fly, like they apparently did with Twilight.
|
|
|
Post by scarlet on Jan 6, 2009 21:03:02 GMT -4
And don't forget that boring Quiluette story that took up like 30 pages in "Eclipse." At least it felt like 30 pages. Actually, it felt like about 100 pages. Boring, boring, and more boring.
|
|