|
|
Post by discoprincess on May 5, 2015 9:48:37 GMT -4
I love seeing these two together again! If only these two had worked it out back in the day...
|
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on May 5, 2015 10:57:45 GMT -4
Why is she dressed like a Wild Wild West extra? She usually looks awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by chiqui on May 5, 2015 11:03:55 GMT -4
That's a very odd dress.
|
|
|
|
Post by FotoStoreSheila on May 5, 2015 11:06:36 GMT -4
It looks like something an Olsen twin would wear, but I'm kind of into it.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 4:04:34 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2015 11:11:17 GMT -4
Why is she snarling?
|
|
|
|
Post by Auroranorth on May 5, 2015 17:40:56 GMT -4
That looks like a combined prom dress and a 1900s blouse. It is not a happy mix.
|
|
|
|
Post by LAX on May 5, 2015 19:14:05 GMT -4
The dress looks like something the Duggars would do to a perfectly nice dress to make it more modest. It's fug but she otherwise looks good, even with the snarl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mutagen on May 5, 2015 22:55:45 GMT -4
It reminds me of one of Lisa's appearances on Drunk History...
|
|
|
|
Post by deeconsistent on May 5, 2015 23:03:19 GMT -4
Why is she dressed like a Wild Wild West extra? She usually looks awesome. Does she? 'Cuz, seriously, if two days ago you'd told me to imagine Lisa Bonet at the Met Gala, that's slightly better than what I'd have pictured. She's gorge, but this might be the closest thing to an outfit that worked that I've ever seen her in. |
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on May 5, 2015 23:16:44 GMT -4
Yeah, awesome is a strong word. But generally she looks like a Stevie Nicks hippy witch, not someone from the 1830s. I guess I am just not feeling the look? Anyway, I thought she looked good at the Vanity Fair party: here and here. She looks nice here, here, and here. |
|
