|
Post by ladyboy on Aug 18, 2019 11:50:10 GMT -4
Couldn't she send him to a dungeon? (although that may be a kink for him, so not really a punishment...)
|
|
ladytrentham
Blueblood
Now tomorrow morning, I'll breakfast in bed, and then get straight up into the tweeds.
Posts: 1,882
Jul 18, 2008 18:30:09 GMT -4
|
Post by ladytrentham on Aug 18, 2019 11:58:29 GMT -4
I think the Queen can take away knighthoods, dukedoms, and other titles, but I think it would be government ministers standing over him while he signed away his rights to the succession. The same way Edward VIII went back to being great-uncle David.
I think what would really hit Andrew hard would be the loss of income--say having to live on his Royal Navy pension and nothing else. No more subsidizing his ex, and they'd both have to live with their daughters.
I think Andrew, in looks and behavior, is a throwback to his great great great great grand uncles the Hanoverian sons of George III.
|
|
|
Post by Auroranorth on Aug 18, 2019 19:52:23 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:40:54 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2019 20:04:43 GMT -4
The Fail headlines are all ahh poor Andrew never noticed a thing most have visited on Epstein on his day off from an being creepy evil bastard.
Meghan eats an avocado and it’s all she causes war and death.
Actually with The Fail man does horrible shit oh he misunderstood, women breathe and it’s all awful flaunty wicked creatures with body parts to present, show, display, flaunt, flash and catch eyes with....
Maybe Parliament to kick Andy to the kerb, while mummy( must be distraught/pissed)kicks brxshit to the other kerb. One could only hope.
|
|
|
Post by Martini Girl on Aug 18, 2019 21:05:24 GMT -4
From Marjorie. It will be interesting to see if the family starts to distance themselves from his toxic rep, but according to her, they're already starting to feel the burn.
Prince Andrew is quite rightly being nailed to the wall by the Daily Mail, with a punishing and relentless series of stories about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, including unbelievably after his prison sentence for under-age sex. Ex-wife Sarah has been roped in as a prop accompanying Andrew to Balmoral and then fleeing with him to Spain when the rancid publicity became too much even for his devoted mother, HM Queen. There was talk of him perhaps remarrying Sarah, though that looks like a stretch.
Sarah, 15 October 1959 9.03 am London is in a distinctly trapped, frustrating and scary phase until early 2022 with tr Pluto square her Libra Sun and Sun/Mars midpoint now, before moving on to square her Mars in Libra in 2021/22. She’s also got a devastating Solar Arc Pluto conjunct her Neptune exact in six months’ time and a jolting Solar Arc Uranus conjunct her Sun in 2020, which will then bump across her Sun/Mars in 2023 and Mars in 2025 – so a long patch of extremely stormy weather, none of which looks like a second honeymoon.
Princess Eugenie, who is the younger daughter and was most affected by the ruptured parental marriage, is sagging badly vis a vis her father from late this September, on and off into early 2020; and looking agitated mid-2020 onwards in relation to family matters. Both Sarah and Beatrice will find mid this November to mid-December the more difficult to cope with in relation to Andrew; as will Princess Anne and Prince Edward.
The Queen’s relationship chart with Andrew is stressed this year, but in major disaster-zone in 2020 from May onwards.
The catastrophic influences Andrew has at the moment of tr Pluto conjunct his Mars/Saturn and his Venus/Saturn lift temporarily from the 24th of this month but then return November 11th to December 18th this year. Into 2020 he faces the reputation-damaging tr Pluto square his Midheaven running for two years.
|
|
|
Post by tabby on Aug 19, 2019 9:11:06 GMT -4
Ex-wife Sarah has been roped in as a prop accompanying Andrew to Balmoral and then fleeing with him to Spain when the rancid publicity became too much even for his devoted mother, HM Queen. There was talk of him perhaps remarrying Sarah, though that looks like a stretch. I was recently reminded that Sarah accepted money from Epstein to pay down some of her not-inconsiderable debt at one point. Something like 15,000 pounds? So she's not completely free of Epstein dirt.
|
|
|
Post by Ladybug on Aug 19, 2019 9:42:24 GMT -4
The DM's top headline for most of the weekend was "The Prince and the Pedophile." It's infuriating that Andrew's statement is basically "I had no idea my longtime friend who'd been convicted in 2009 was doing all of this horrible stuff!" I don't think Mummy can protect him from this anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:40:54 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2019 10:13:17 GMT -4
The main Fail headline now is “Meghan and Harry’s gas guzzling 4 flights in 11 days” with the headline” Andy hosted Epstein and young model in Balmoral while Queen in residence” well down past other stuff probably over half a page scroll down, only scrolled that far down to see where the Andy headline was!
|
|
|
Post by Ladybug on Aug 19, 2019 10:28:12 GMT -4
I think the top DM headline is based on user traffic. So when a story has been up for a while and the traffic slows down, another story will take it's place. The Andy story was at the top spot all weekend.
The Andrew/Epstein story is being covered extensively by the media.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Aug 19, 2019 10:39:47 GMT -4
The Andrew/Epstein story is being covered extensively by the media. Coverage has really blown up now that they have actual information to report and there is general interest in the Epstein case. For months I have been reading gossip columnists and their commenters complaining about lack of Epstein coverage in comparison to Harry and Meghan. But those same gossip columnists had no actual interest in writing about Andrew/Epstein either. They just indignantly thought that other people should be doing it. Ditto gossip forums. Other than this board where there is an existing Andrew thread, I still don't see new Andrew threads cropping up on other forums. Meghan and Harry are still the hot topic that people want to discuss, not Andrew. Yet they will still complain about the lack of discussion about Andrew as if it's somebody else's responsibility to be interested. If everybody's still going to the Daily Mail and clicking on the Harry/Meghan articles and bypassing the many, many Andrew articles, Harry and Meghan will remain on top.
|
|