|
Post by Ladybug on Aug 19, 2019 11:41:58 GMT -4
Washington Post article From the article: QE has blinders on with him. She loses credibility the longer she publicly shows support for him. I hope the media keeps digging up the dirt on him.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 12:45:32 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2019 11:58:50 GMT -4
The Andrew/Epstein story is being covered extensively by the media. Coverage has really blown up now that they have actual information to report and there is general interest in the Epstein case. For months I have been reading gossip columnists and their commenters complaining about lack of Epstein coverage in comparison to Harry and Meghan. But those same gossip columnists had no actual interest in writing about Andrew/Epstein either. They just indignantly thought that other people should be doing it. Ditto gossip forums. Other than this board where there is an existing Andrew thread, I still don't see new Andrew threads cropping up on other forums. Meghan and Harry are still the hot topic that people want to discuss, not Andrew. Yet they will still complain about the lack of discussion about Andrew as if it's somebody else's responsibility to be interested. If everybody's still going to the Daily Mail and clicking on the Harry/Meghan articles and bypassing the many, many Andrew articles, Harry and Meghan will remain on top. Meghan and Harry are still the hot topic because for the last 8 months it's been a fucking pile-on. And people do love a pile-on. And Sarah is not being used as a prop. She is all-in on this, protecting Andrew by tittering about their relationship in no-doubt paid interviews, because without Andrew in the monarch's good graces, she is broker than broke. And she does love her money. I still think she, or someone in her circle, is the source of the stories about Harry and Meghan. To "re-orient the public perception".
|
|
|
Post by Matilda on Aug 19, 2019 15:44:31 GMT -4
Not really a denial, is it? You can be appalled by lots of things and find them completely abhorrent, while still doing them.
|
|
|
Post by chonies on Aug 19, 2019 16:12:38 GMT -4
Not really a denial, is it? You can be appalled by lots of things and find them completely abhorrent, while still doing them. At the risk of dropping an anvil on your understated tone, surely this is a large part of the thrill, too.
|
|
|
Post by Matilda on Aug 19, 2019 17:54:22 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 12:45:32 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2019 18:08:09 GMT -4
Help those young women get justice?? Andrew: "I'm sorry, but my lawyers won't allow me to travel to the US ever again."
|
|
|
Post by Matilda on Aug 19, 2019 18:11:43 GMT -4
I could see Andrew having a little accident before this gets too uncomfortable for "The Firm". I probably shouldn't say that, if you never hear from me again you know why
|
|
|
Post by lordofthefries on Aug 19, 2019 18:24:59 GMT -4
Coverage has really blown up now that they have actual information to report and there is general interest in the Epstein case. For months I have been reading gossip columnists and their commenters complaining about lack of Epstein coverage in comparison to Harry and Meghan. But those same gossip columnists had no actual interest in writing about Andrew/Epstein either. They just indignantly thought that other people should be doing it. Ditto gossip forums. Other than this board where there is an existing Andrew thread, I still don't see new Andrew threads cropping up on other forums. Meghan and Harry are still the hot topic that people want to discuss, not Andrew. Yet they will still complain about the lack of discussion about Andrew as if it's somebody else's responsibility to be interested. If everybody's still going to the Daily Mail and clicking on the Harry/Meghan articles and bypassing the many, many Andrew articles, Harry and Meghan will remain on top. Meghan and Harry are still the hot topic because for the last 8 months it's been a fucking pile-on. And people do love a pile-on. I personally feel like I have the indignation to be outraged at both Andrew's likely criminal activities and (less outraged but still) at Meghan and Harry's blatant hypocrisy/posturing.
|
|
|
Post by mrspickles on Aug 19, 2019 20:45:22 GMT -4
I could see Andrew having a little accident before this gets too uncomfortable for "The Firm". I probably shouldn't say that, if you never hear from me again you know why Did I imagine seeing an article over the weekend about him retiring from service due to health concerns?
|
|
|
Post by Martini Girl on Aug 19, 2019 21:50:53 GMT -4
MrsPickles-- I didn't see any articles to that effect, but I did see an article linking Andy to Epstein more than 20 times-- many of them AFTER he was convicted. Not good. And Virginia was also shown to be there too.
|
|