dragonflie
Blueblood
Posts: 1,961
Mar 14, 2005 2:10:14 GMT -4
|
Post by dragonflie on Mar 26, 2024 11:32:56 GMT -4
There are pics. The pics show both Harry and William hanging out with Diddy. Many many years ago.
|
|
|
Post by canuckcutie on Mar 26, 2024 11:58:33 GMT -4
Yes I’ve seen the picture in question and if that was the only contact with the two of them, why is William not referenced in the feds document? Plus I don’t count hanging out at a Diana concert as “partying” with Harry. That’s why I’m curious what other contact there has been beyeeen Harry & Diddy over the years.
|
|
dragonflie
Blueblood
Posts: 1,961
Mar 14, 2005 2:10:14 GMT -4
|
Post by dragonflie on Mar 26, 2024 13:16:47 GMT -4
canuckcutie- good point! I'll admit I didn't delve into this story much before posting about the one or 2 pics I saw online.
|
|
|
Post by canuckcutie on Apr 15, 2024 15:06:13 GMT -4
The Times had an update on Harry’s judicial review over the loss of his police protection. Harry lost the case in February and was on the hook for the Home Office’s court costs. The Judge refused Harry’s request for an appeal so Harry’s lawyers have announced they are going to the Court of Appeal.
In addition as the Home Office apparently dragged their feet on releasing documents to Harry’s team, Harry who previously stated that he wouldn’t be burdening the tax payer with a bill, wanted a reduction of 50-60% in the legal fees he owed. The Judge threw him a bone and gave him a discount of 10%. With an appeal on the horizon the legal bills will keep on climbing!
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 15, 2024 16:09:34 GMT -4
Yeah, Harry's claim that he doesn't want to burden taxpayers with his security costs is belied by his efforts to dump as much of his legal costs on taxpayers as possible, as he continues to appeal a case that's been futile from the start.
|
|
Tiana
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 153
Jan 16, 2022 16:53:16 GMT -4
|
Post by Tiana on Apr 15, 2024 18:05:31 GMT -4
Oops, he did it again.
After getting told an appeal wasn't happening, documents in court show that Harry violated confidential rules in the case by leaking contents of the case to two different people. One, a spin doctor at Schillings, one of his law firms. And two, a man named Johnny Mercer who works for the government as the Veteran's Minister who's at the forefront of pitching a 26 million pound spending budget for an Invictus bid next year. Harry had to "apologize" to the court for leaking, just like Meghan had to apologize for "forgetting" she actually did leak info to Omid Scobie.
If he weren't a prince, he wouldn't have been able to get away with such a light punishment, especially since he's been taken to task for doing this before. For someone who complains ad naseum about his family "leaking" against him, he sure seems to just that. I can't attach a link for some reason but it's available on the Daily Telegraph.
|
|
|
Post by tiggertoo on Apr 15, 2024 18:11:09 GMT -4
Well, I, for one, am very happy with the outcome. He leaked confidential information? Privacy loving Harry? So, he had to apologize. I think he needs to be made to stand in a public square and apologize. And apologize for wasting taxpayers money.
And his wife can stand beside him and apologize publicly for lying to the court. Oops,I mean, ‘forgetting’ about her collaboration with Omid Scobie, spoon feeding him stories.
|
|
|
Post by Ladybug on Apr 16, 2024 10:07:38 GMT -4
Yeah, Harry's claim that he doesn't want to burden taxpayers with his security costs is belied by his efforts to dump as much of his legal costs on taxpayers as possible, as he continues to appeal a case that's been futile from the start. After getting told an appeal wasn't happening, documents in court show that Harry violated confidential rules in the case by leaking contents of the case to two different people. One, a spin doctor at Schillings, one of his law firms. And two, a man named Johnny Mercer who works for the government as the Veteran's Minister who's at the forefront of pitching a 26 million pound spending budget for an Invictus bid next year. Harry had to "apologize" to the court for leaking, just like Meghan had to apologize for "forgetting" she actually did leak info to Omid Scobie. And people still defend this twit and argue that he's been so mistreated. Make it make sense.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 16, 2024 10:40:18 GMT -4
The stupid thing about this confidentiality situation is that Harry is the one who requested an ultra-strict ring of confidentiality and his request was granted.
As the court told him the first time he was caught leaking information to outsiders, the confidentiality rules he insisted upon apply to him as much as they do to anyone else involved. He clearly thinks the rules should just be for everyone else, which is a recurrent theme for him.
|
|
|
Post by canuckcutie on Apr 16, 2024 11:05:15 GMT -4
Kinda ironic that the guy who kept bleating in Spare about family, friends and those dreaded men in grey leaking is actually the guy who keeps getting called out for leaking….
Between Meghan getting called out for “forgetting” she assisted with Omid’s books and Harry getting called out for leaking information, their many court cases have a habit of blowing up in their faces.
I think he & Meghan leak so often that they wrongly assume everyone everyone else is doing it too.
|
|