|
Post by Wol on May 29, 2008 15:46:32 GMT -4
She used to go to the same nail salon as me way back when she was really famous, post Basic Instinct. She was incredibly beautiful, without makeup even, just beautiful. Her looks may not be your taste, but there is nothing off or wonky about her features. It's a little eerie how "perfect" she looks. She was definitely rocking the diva 'tude back then. I remember she was looking at a magazine and then got on her phone and either called the Valentino store or Valentino himself to ask that they send over a handbag she was looking at in an advertisement. She was like "I'm looking at it right now, I have to have it." She may have been FOS, but it was fun to watch. She never wore jeans, she was always in some elegant get up. We once had a nutty conversation about toe rings, cause she asked about one I was wearing. I also like the story she told on Inside the Actors Studio about being with Roy London when he died. But yeah, she's prolly batshit, and the karma comment was way out of line.
|
|
|
Post by Matilda on May 29, 2008 16:09:16 GMT -4
She's 50 years old and she's just realised that? Stupid, self-absorbed bitch.
|
|
normadesmond
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 12:49:19 GMT -4
|
Post by normadesmond on May 29, 2008 22:21:34 GMT -4
So does that mean we can attribute her endless string of bombs and Razzie-award-winning endeavors to "bad karma"? Because that wouldn't happen to a "nice person" would it?
|
|
hikertrash
Sloane Ranger
Duh, winning!
Posts: 2,063
Mar 11, 2005 16:42:58 GMT -4
|
Post by hikertrash on May 29, 2008 22:57:04 GMT -4
So does that mean we can attribute her endless string of bombs and Razzie-award-winning endeavors to "bad karma"? Because that wouldn't happen to a "nice person" would it? Yes, and I think we can also attribute her part in Casino to Scorcese and DeNiro putting their heads down and being of service to her. It made them cry.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jun 5, 2008 1:00:03 GMT -4
|
|
hikertrash
Sloane Ranger
Duh, winning!
Posts: 2,063
Mar 11, 2005 16:42:58 GMT -4
|
Post by hikertrash on Jun 5, 2008 2:52:53 GMT -4
I'm surprised she didn't say she was just doing research for a role.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 12:49:19 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2008 4:28:21 GMT -4
I thought that the Chinese Government were notoriously hard on their public? The Chinese Government are doing a public service there! Judging by the recent caliber of Sharon Stone films!
|
|
|
Post by Atreides on Jun 5, 2008 11:08:45 GMT -4
I give her props though for not using the tired old "I'm sorry if you were offended" apology line so many people use.
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jun 6, 2008 11:02:53 GMT -4
I thought that the Chinese Government were notoriously hard on their public? The Chinese Government are doing a public service there! Judging by the recent caliber of Sharon Stone films! I think only a particular cinema chain is refusing to show her films; it's not the government's doing (at least, not on the surface). I'm actually happy about that -- Sharon Stone's comments were beyond asshattish, but I've always hated how triggerhappy China seems to get when it comes to banning people/movies/whatever that offends the government's national sensibilities. But an independent cinema chain? Ban away!
|
|
|
Post by sugarhigh on Sept 23, 2008 12:43:47 GMT -4
|
|