|
Post by Martini Girl on May 30, 2019 21:50:10 GMT -4
I don't know why, but I actually don't mind their style. I agree that MK does not look well.
|
|
tanyak
Blueblood
Posts: 1,803
Feb 26, 2007 1:29:22 GMT -4
|
Post by tanyak on May 31, 2019 23:54:23 GMT -4
Not that women need to run around smiling all the time, but they used to and now they don’t. Ashley will occasionally have a small closed-mouth smile, but nothing from MK. It would probably make whatever is going on with her cheeks a little less noticeable.
|
|
|
Post by Babycakes on Jun 14, 2019 19:10:29 GMT -4
Celebrated their 33rd birthday with friends and cigarettes. I wonder why they don't switch to vape pens (not that they're much better)? I seriously hate cigarettes and cigarette smoke. # judgmental
|
|
|
Post by chiqui on Jun 15, 2019 12:58:28 GMT -4
They want to keep thin, I guess.
I guess what they will look like, and feel like, when they hit 50 isn't an issue.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on Jun 16, 2019 2:06:54 GMT -4
They look like very old toddlers.
|
|
boxofrocks
Blueblood
Posts: 1,769
Aug 25, 2007 11:01:39 GMT -4
|
Post by boxofrocks on Jun 16, 2019 13:49:35 GMT -4
They want to keep thin, I guess. I guess what they will look like, and feel like, when they hit 50 isn't an issue. That is what plastic surgeons and dermatologists are for. Consequences are for the poors!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 14:43:06 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 13:55:07 GMT -4
I'm also wondering if rich people have access to magical oncologists or something because, as far as I know, cancer still doesn't discriminate...
I'm being judgmental, yes. Probably because I just recently read about the bowls of cigarettes as wedding centerpieces and ... ew. I get being addicted to nicotine (I was during my entire 20s, unfortch), but glamorizing it? Why? Yuck.
|
|
|
Post by famvir on Jun 16, 2019 16:10:50 GMT -4
They are not identical twins, right? So they would look no more similar than they do to their sibs.
I think Mary Kate is also eschewing the “Olson” make up. She does look thin and haggard, I do admit.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Jun 16, 2019 16:24:39 GMT -4
They are not identical twins, right? So they would look no more similar than they do to their sibs. They are fraternal. However, they do look much more like each other than they do their sister. They are the same height and sometimes I have trouble telling them apart, but I would never mistake either one of them for Elizabeth. Genetic coincidence though I guess.
|
|
|
Post by prisma on Jun 16, 2019 17:12:51 GMT -4
I was curious and I just looked it up: Ashley is 5'1, MK is 5'2, and Elizabeth is 5'6. In pictures the twins looked so tiny next to Elizabeth--I'm surprised the height difference isn't greater.
I don't think it's been mentioned here in a while, but do you all remember the big "countdowns" to the twins' 18th birthday when they became legal? That would have been 15 years ago (!), so I don't remember what types of sites did it...they were definitely "men's interest" sites.I can't imagine how that would have affected me if I were in their place. They grew up in the public eye and to be aware that there was this public interest in counting down the days til you were legally fuckable and the sense of kink because you're fuckable twins whom the public had known since you were babies...I don't know how many other people could relate to that precise experience. Very icky. I wouldn't be surprised if that contributed to their super covered-up, old-lady-socialite fashion sense.
|
|