Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 8:36:41 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2011 8:50:11 GMT -4
I saw her in person once and her face looked normal to me. She was promoting her furniture line at a store. That was the only reason I happened to see her. Anyway, I stood in line just because I happened to be there (no, I did not go out of my way to see Cindy Crawford at the furniture store), got her autograph since they gave the pictures away free, and analyzed her face while she was signing. She looked perfectly fine/good/possibly better in person. But I have noticed she looks different/weird in photos.
I wonder if these new cameras exaggerate things that you wouldn't notice if you saw the celebrity in person.
Maybe that's why Nicole Kidman doesn't realize we can tell she's had plastic surgery. In person, perhaps it doesn't actually show itself to her husband or in the mirror. Maybe one has to look at photos to realize that the cameras in fact can reveal what the person has done to her face.
|
|
|
Post by margojata on Jun 16, 2011 8:59:55 GMT -4
Well, I think it's very much like Demi Moore. She looks perfectly normal - pretty. But .. different. It's just not the same face. Sure, we still know it's Cindy, but there's an element to her face now that makes her look like a slightly different person. I guess that's probably subtle botox. Nicole and Kim Kardashian are freaky looking, but Cindy and Demi still look good.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 8:36:41 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2011 9:10:41 GMT -4
I think the weirdness shows up in photos.
But what I meant is that it was hard to decipher the weirdness in person.
I was rather surprised, because I did think she looked better in person.
Perhaps her surgery has been more subtle, I'm not sure, but when I saw her in person I wondered why the same plastic surgery flaws I could see in a photo I couldn't seem to decipher when I saw her in person. In photos she looks kind of...hard the way Demi Moore does. But in person she looked nice. In person, she sort of looked the way she did in her younger photos.
She had really nice hair too.
|
|
comfortablynumb
Blueblood
Threadkiller: Ask Me How!
Posts: 1,216
Mar 19, 2005 19:30:57 GMT -4
|
Post by comfortablynumb on Jun 16, 2011 9:23:16 GMT -4
I think the whole family is attractive. Redneck? Maybe. Cheating douche bag? Maybe. But physically, I think they look nice. That is one handsome son she has.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 8:36:41 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2011 18:07:51 GMT -4
I think Cindy looks more angular than she used to. Maybe it is just due to aging and losing those youthful fat pads.
|
|
|
Post by pathtaken on Feb 15, 2015 18:13:08 GMT -4
Unretouched photo making rounds on the news/internet. Looks like a real 48 year old mom picture to me. I am more and more amazed at the ability of picture manipulation.
|
|
|
Post by lea1977 on Feb 15, 2015 18:34:26 GMT -4
Well, I think that she looks healthy and that is what is most important. She looks better than most 49 year old women in a bikini but her body does looks real, she looks like a woman that has had 2 children .
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Feb 15, 2015 18:51:27 GMT -4
I don't really get why people are applauding Crawford when it's my understanding that this is an unretouched photo leak that was never supposed to see the light of day, but she looks good for a lady approaching 50 (or any age, really).
|
|
|
Post by chonies on Feb 15, 2015 19:23:00 GMT -4
I thought she leaked it herself. I don't know if that's daring, but I like that she did it.
ETA: Hamatron, I'm not sure if it's true, but I hope it is.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Feb 15, 2015 19:34:01 GMT -4
Oh, sorry! I missed that. The CNN article seems to have no clue where the pic came from. If she did it herself, that's cool.
|
|