|
Post by lea1977 on Mar 1, 2015 18:26:35 GMT -4
There are pictures of Cindy paddleboarding from a few years ago link, she looks great. She has had two children and is healthy but she isn't one of those woman that looks a decade younger that she is. Why didn't she get upset over these pictures?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 1:23:32 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2015 18:54:51 GMT -4
When it comes to hawking anti-aging products these chicks are all in it together. It's smarter to support each other despite the fact that they have competing brands because what really matters is the message. Selling the dream of smooth-looking skin at any age puts money in all of their pockets. Selling "anti-aging" products feeds right into ageism. There's nothing wrong with beauty care products per se, it's calling them anti-aging and effectively promoting them as a "cure" for this disease called "aging" that's the problem. Christie Brinkley and Cindy Crawford are not championing against ageism whether they look "flawless and perfect" naturally or otherwise as long as they are promoting and selling these products. BTW, the Better Than Ever campaign doesn't contain any powerful social messages about the rules for aging. Excuse me for sounding ageist, but the video looks like Christie Brinkley invited her gay grandson and all his friends over for a pool party. The photos of Christie and the other older models are more about hot guys than sexy older women.
|
|
|
Post by kostgard on Mar 1, 2015 19:30:41 GMT -4
There are pictures of Cindy paddleboarding from a few years ago link, she looks great. She has had two children and is healthy but she isn't one of those woman that looks a decade younger that she is. Why didn't she get upset over these pictures? Those pictures make me think the leaked pics were not doctored in any way - it looks like the same body with terrible lighting. And she looks fine. She looks like a beautiful healthy woman who has had kids. She really needs to relax about this.
|
|
|
Post by Sunnyhorse on Mar 1, 2015 19:48:18 GMT -4
She does still model, and it's possible that having a pic like that floating around out there could damage her career. It's kind of like when Reese Witherspoon filed a lawsuit against a tabloid that announced that she was pregnant when she wasn't -- sure, we might not care, but she could very well lose work because of it. I can't hold this against Cindy.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 1:23:32 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2015 22:42:21 GMT -4
Her career doesn't center around modeling anymore. Meaningful Beauty has dominated her career for the last 5 years, and it's her product, so no one has the power to hire or fire her. Cindy herself claims that this product reverses aging and uses pics of herself in the 20s and 40s for comparison and proof that it works. The ads don't say you'll look like a beautiful 40-something woman if you use my magic-melon product. They say you'll be a 40-something woman who looks like you're in your 20s forfuckingever if you use my magic-melon product. If there are pics of her floating around where she looks like a beautiful 40-something woman who looks like she's in her 40s (the horror!) which causes her to lose money, then that would mostly be on her for making false claims and only slightly be the fault of whomever leaked the pic for exposing the false claims.
|
|
|
Post by lea1977 on Mar 1, 2015 22:50:59 GMT -4
Cindy is still a beautiful woman that is in her late 40s and quite frankly looks like she is in her 40s. She has changed just like the rest of us, we all can't be Christy Turlington.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Mar 1, 2015 22:54:26 GMT -4
Huh. I mean, she looks great, but no one looks 20 when they are 49. That would be ridiculous. The best you can hope for is a timeless thing, like Angela Bassett or, oddly enough, Martha Stewart (somewhere in her 40s she stopped aging! Check it out!).
|
|
|
Post by GoldenFleece on Mar 1, 2015 23:13:24 GMT -4
Huh. I mean, she looks great, but no one looks 20 when they are 49. That would be ridiculous. The best you can hope for is a timeless thing, like Angela Bassett or, oddly enough, Martha Stewart (somewhere in her 40s she stopped aging! Check it out!). I'm pretty sure Angela Bassett has had some work done through the years. There are pictures of Cindy paddleboarding from a few years ago link, she looks great. She has had two children and is healthy but she isn't one of those woman that looks a decade younger that she is. Why didn't she get upset over these pictures? Those photos are from 2007....I guess this was before Meaningful Beauty really took off? I feel like I've seen plenty of photos of her in bikinis (all those couples vacations to Cabo with Clooney) since then where her stomach didn't look like that. Either all of her paparazzi photos have been retouched (I don't think even the Kardashians can manage that), or after those photos leaked, she went in for some nipping/tucking/lasering to tighten things up. If she's really just Photoshopping her way to youthful good looks while hawking a skin care line, that's a bit like Suzanne Somers getting busted for lipo as she sold all those Thighmasters. Though from what I've seen of the Dr. Sebagh infommercials, it's more focused on the face/neck than the body. A lawsuit seems like the worst way to handle something like this.
|
|
|
Post by Atreides on Mar 1, 2015 23:16:00 GMT -4
Huh. I mean, she looks great, but no one looks 20 when they are 49. Paul Rudd and Halle Berry say wassup! Cindy still looks great for her age. Actually, pretty much all of the late 80s supermodels still look fantastic: Cindy, Claudia, Christy, Linda, and Naomi.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Mar 1, 2015 23:16:24 GMT -4
And Steve Carrell and Tiny Fey. Debbie Harry looks amazing. Pharrell Williams is presumably a time-traveling warlock.
And fair enough on Bassett. And I'm sure Martha has as well. But I still think they look great. Some people hit a period where their face stays the same for decades.
|
|