yalil
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by yalil on Apr 18, 2008 0:23:50 GMT -4
I think Disney purposefully chooses that thin, shrill croaky voice (Hilary Duff, Vanessa Hudgens). Maybe they commissioned some random study that concluded that icky voices attract more kids.
|
|
|
Post by divasahm on Apr 18, 2008 11:20:02 GMT -4
I think Disney purposefully chooses that thin, shrill croaky voice (Hilary Duff, Vanessa Hudgens). Maybe they commissioned some random study that concluded that icky voices attract more kids. It's called the "You, Too, Can Be a Disney Pop Star Despite Your Offensive Voice, Average Looks, and Probable Propensity to Cut Loose and Become Totally Wild Once Your Contract Expires" marketing plan.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2008 14:18:32 GMT -4
Even her normal speaking voice is quite atrocious.
At least the other Disney stars and Mickey Mouse kids had normal speaking voices.
She seems genuinely nice though. All these other kid stars seem kind of fake-- even during her good girl days Britney seemed pretty fake-- but Miley seems sincerely nice. If she's not genuinely like that I'd be surprised.
|
|
augurey
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by augurey on Apr 18, 2008 15:46:20 GMT -4
But the girl is dumb as heck.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2008 11:01:27 GMT -4
AOL News had the headline "She's Snapped on the Lap of a Guy, Flashing Lacy Bra: Dirty Pics Leaked" for these pics I'm no fan of Miley Cyrus, but headlines like that piss me off. They forgot to mention the lap belongs to a guy her age and the flashing consists of showing a little bit of her bra. They are not "dirty." They're just pics of a typical teen trying (and failing) to look sexy. If someone is trying to hurt her image by leaking these types of photos of her I doubt it's working. Just because a girl loves Jesus doesn't mean she's required to be sweet and demure all the time.
|
|
abbynormal
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by abbynormal on Apr 21, 2008 12:27:15 GMT -4
Those pictures are facebook-tastic.
|
|
|
Post by Spinderella on Apr 21, 2008 12:30:16 GMT -4
Pfft.
Clearly these are shots of her being dorky/silly. So lame! And yes, the guy is clearly in her age group. Ah, headlines. How I HATE thee.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 16:46:16 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2008 12:33:35 GMT -4
Honestly? I think that the bra picture in particular is way too sexualised for a girl her age. What is she? 14? They make me feel pretty uncomfortable, to be honest. She's playing at being a sexual person, which may be fair enough - but if she's serious about her avowed virginity, then she's sending out the wrong message not only to Mr. Blue Balls that she's sprawled all over, but to whoever she sent that bra picture to. And why would you send a picture like that to someone at 14 anyway? It seems to be one of those pics teens send to each other over MySpace. A stupid and dangerous game. If this was my 14 year old daughter, I'd go through her for a short cut and I'd put a block on MySpace. And yeah, it might not work, but she's just too dumb not to try. There are so many predators out there and she's just sitting there all Lolita, showin' her bra and trying to look sexy for whoever she's taking the picture for. And it's not even the first time she's done this! Anyone remember this?? The girl hasn't a clue of the dangers. Not. A. Clue.
|
|
|
Post by chiqui on Apr 21, 2008 12:43:58 GMT -4
She looks really chubby-faced and average in those pics. She does have nicely toned abs though.
IMO she's coming close to jailbait territory. But that's OK, because it might kill off the career of this litle twit.
|
|
velveeta
Lady in Waiting
Posts: 344
Sept 25, 2006 20:02:04 GMT -4
|
Post by velveeta on Apr 21, 2008 18:04:39 GMT -4
Those pictures are really inappropriate, but seem to be pretty much par for the course with teens these days. Which is why I'm packing up my girls and moving to the woods.
|
|