|
Post by Auroranorth on May 21, 2009 14:21:58 GMT -4
I think they all deserve to be dumped in a tub of saltpeter.
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Jun 1, 2009 1:08:10 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 20:48:34 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2009 17:28:37 GMT -4
4chan (link not to 4chan) got it much better than Steph would. (Because, really, who thinks that Stephie would really come up with something that lol-larious?)
|
|
huntergrayson
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 20:48:34 GMT -4
|
Post by huntergrayson on Jun 6, 2009 1:09:25 GMT -4
OMG, remember that crazy chick from YouTube that yelled at Stephen King? The Soup just had a clip of her freaking out about the New Moon trailer. So much LOL.
|
|
kathy1977
Blueblood
Posts: 1,049
Jun 14, 2005 16:17:41 GMT -4
|
Post by kathy1977 on Jun 18, 2009 8:50:44 GMT -4
I caved.
I went to my local Barnes and Noble and they had this elaborate setup for all the Twilight books. It literally looked like a shrine or something.
I think I am the only person in America, hell maybe even the world, who has yet to read these books. And I have been resisting the urge because it's been my experience when a book is this talked about, it's most likely gonna suck ass.
But on the other hand, maybe these books really aren't that bad. Obviously not Shakespeare but a good, entertaining read. There has to be a reason they're so popular. There just has to be.
Looks like I'm about to find out.
|
|
|
Post by Auroranorth on Jun 18, 2009 10:15:12 GMT -4
I tried starting the first book, got five chapters in and quit out of boredom and mild nausea.
|
|
|
Post by bitca on Jun 18, 2009 12:23:58 GMT -4
The first book is definitely the most boring. I would skip it and just watch the movie. The movie's pretty accurate without all the "blah blah blah" that's in the book. Seriously, each of those books are 500 pages and they could have been cut down to at least 200. At least!
It still makes me laugh that we have a thread called "The WORKS of Stephenie Meyer."
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 20:48:34 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2009 12:40:36 GMT -4
One thing that was incredible to me was that the first book was sooooo looooong and...hardly anything happened. Like, the first three-fourths of it was all Bella whining about Edward and her high school and how Washington is too green and then in the last quarter there's a little vampire menace miniplot thrown in. I was also boggled when it was like blah blaaaahhh science class, they say two words to one another, Bella thinks he hates her, and then he saves her from thugs in an alley and they have a Coke and then she's all, "I knew I was completely, hopelessly, IRREVOCABLY in love with him!" (I noticed Meyer uses "irrevocably" a lot. She doesn't quite use it wrong, but it's such a weird choice that I have to wonder if she really knows what it means. I mean, why describe something - I think it was a moonlight night or something - as "irrevocably beautiful"? That doesn't really describe the beauty at all. It's not really an appropriate intensifier, either.) It was one insipid conversation in a diner! Also, Edward is totally Tom Cruise about Bella. "You're just so...amazing! You're just so different! I can't say specifically how because in 500 pages of narrative you demonstrate no personality or interests or insight, but your blood is like flowers!"
|
|
dwanollah
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 20:48:34 GMT -4
|
Post by dwanollah on Jun 18, 2009 13:24:32 GMT -4
One thing that was incredible to me was that the first book was sooooo looooong and...hardly anything happened. Like, the first three-fourths of it was all Bella whining about Edward and her high school and how Washington is too green and then in the last quarter there's a little vampire menace miniplot thrown in. I was also boggled when it was like blah blaaaahhh science class, they say two words to one another, Bella thinks he hates her, and then he saves her from thugs in an alley and they have a Coke and then she's all, "I knew I was completely, hopelessly, IRREVOCABLY in love with him!" (I noticed Meyer uses "irrevocably" a lot. She doesn't quite use it wrong, but it's such a weird choice that I have to wonder if she really knows what it means. I mean, why describe something - I think it was a moonlight night or something - as "irrevocably beautiful"? That doesn't really describe the beauty at all. It's not really an appropriate intensifier, either.) It was one insipid conversation in a diner! Also, Edward is totally Tom Cruise about Bella. "You're just so...amazing! You're just so different! I can't say specifically how because in 500 pages of narrative you demonstrate no personality or interests or insight, but your blood is like flowers!" See, this is one of the major things I'm battling with in my own novel. It's 300+ pages, and I'm picking apart every chapter, every scene, asking the basic editorial question, "Does this move the plot forward? Does this part do new work?" And yet SM can churn out 500pgs of bad fanfic-quality drivel and... bingo! Not that I'm bitter, jealous or pissed or anything.
|
|
|
Post by bitca on Jun 18, 2009 14:45:43 GMT -4
See, this is one of the major things I'm battling with in my own novel. It's 300+ pages, and I'm picking apart every chapter, every scene, asking the basic editorial question, "Does this move the plot forward? Does this part do new work?" And yet SM can churn out 500pgs of bad fanfic-quality drivel and... bingo! Two words: Peer review!
|
|