Disturbing Movie Moments

[vegasusa555]

I really need to start listening to you guys! I watched Audition last night on the Sundance channel, and I still am creeped out by it. Strangely enough, it wasn't the torture scene that got to me (even though it was pretty bad!), but the part where the girl fed the guy vomit! That was so fucking disgusting!

Also, I never thought that just seeing a lumpy burlap sack move across a room would make me nearly piss myself! This movie is definately a "One-timer" because I don't think I could ever sit through it again.

[tinyshoes]

There was that moment in Casino where Joe Pesci and gang stuck this guy's head in a vise and tightened it until the guy's eye popped out. Just thinking about it gives me the willies.

[rattlerbrat]

Thingee said:

The most disturbing thing about this movie? It launched Chloe Sevigny's

[/color] career.[/quote]

*snort* Who?

[veronicamars]

Straw Dogs. I rest my case.

[monsterzero]

"The Texas Chainsaw Massacre", part one, is bad enough. Little did I know there was a sequel back in the 1980s. I tried watching it, and now I know why it's been mostly forgotten. All it is is scene after scene of this poor woman being tortured by Leatherface, his dad, his brother, and the corpse of his grandfather. I've sat through dozens of horror movies and I have never, ever been disturbed so badly I had to turn the movie off. Until I tried watching this wrteched piece of junk.

I've been waiting for MGM to release the uncut version of TCM part 2 as I don't think it was a good movie at all. The whole movie seems to be odd in how it wants to go. On one hand, it wants to be another version of the first one (with the screaming pursued woman by the inbred cannibals) yet then it wants to be a revenge story in which a rogue lawman decides to take out the family as he was related to the people in the first one. Yet at the end of the movie...huh?? We get some resolution for the first movie yet the second movie, there is none. It just cuts off leaving everybody to wonder exactly why they hired Dennis Hopper in the first place. Seriously, it was the part of the movie I was going to enjoy (chainsaw duels, everybody!), but nope...I still think the version I saw was cut, I really do.

And honestly, it's really stupid to boot. Seriously, it was a cheap '80s sequel to get some money and turned a fairly good horror flick into a frachised piece of shit.

Oh sweet jebus! that's it! That stupid poster is still seriously freaky.

Don't worry Chuppie, if it helps any it's a charles Band movie which means it's not where as scary as the movie poster gives the impression that it is. Click here to see how stupid the movie really is (it's the cover to the third movie where they apparently GO TO COLLEGE).

[Deleted]

Monster said:

I've been waiting for MGM to release the uncut version of TCM part 2 as I don't think it was a good movie at all. The whole movie seems to be odd in how it wants to go. On one hand, it wants to be another version of the first one (with the screaming pursued woman by the inbred cannibals) yet then it wants to be a revenge story in which a rogue lawman decides to take out the family as he was related to the people in the first one. Yet at the end of the movie...huh?? We get some resolution for the first movie yet the second movie, there is none. It just cuts off leaving everybody to wonder exactly why they hired Dennis Hopper in the first place. Seriously, it was the part of the movie I was going to enjoy (chainsaw duels, everybody!), but nope...I still think the version I saw was cut, I really do.

And honestly, it's really stupid to boot. Seriously, it was a cheap '80s sequel to get some money and turned a fairly good horror flick into a frachised piece of shit.

TCM, part 1, was really disturbing to a 13 year-old me. But I will always have a soft spot in my heart for TCM, part 2. I saw it much later, and it was so stupid, I got so many good laughs out of it. A lot of horror movies are like that for me. I guess I'm just weird that way.

[veronicamars]

Saw Prince of Tides over the weekend-the rape scene-which was discussed upthread is disturbing and i have to say, I don't know why, but I found the rape of Nick Noltes's character the most disturbing of all.

[Deleted]

veronicamars said:

Straw Dogs. I rest my case.

Veronicamars -- One time a friend and I were browsing through the video store and I picked up Straw Dogs. I was figuring that something with Dustin Hoffman was bound to be interesting. She snatched it out of my hand (literally!) and said, "No! No! You don't want to watch that!" She knows that I get upset over torture type violence. I took her word for it, and the thing is, without knowing anything about it, I'm scared of that movie to this day.

And yes, the rape scene in The Prince of Tides had me shaking. I wish I'd never seen it.

[emersende]

I watched Quest for Fire over the weekend. The attack scenes at the beginning, with the women being dragged off? And the weird ape attacker hanging onto the edge of the rock while his hands are smashed with big stones? Yikes.

The most disturbing part, though, was in the cannibal tribe, when you see the two victims-to-be hanging up, tied by their hands and feet to a tree. Later you see them again, and one of them is hanging by one wrist while his other arm, hacked off at the elbow, just hangs there. In the next shot, you see one of the cannibals eating the arm!

It's a great movie, but there are scenes I just have to skip over.

[pezley]

Oldboy disturbed me to no end. I had to take 2 showers after watching it.

Oh and The Dark Crystal will always disturb me. I remember watching it as kid and not being able to sleep for a week because I was scared the Skeksies would get me. And then I saw it a couple of years ago again, same thing happened.