Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:53:52 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2013 17:51:45 GMT -4
This may end up being a good zombie flick, but based on what I've seen, it's not World War Z. Which is a shame, I love that book. That's my impression as well. From what I can tell, the only thing the book and the movie have in common is the title and that it's about a zombie apocalypse. I'll probably skip it. I'm just not digging the idea of a Brad Pitt-saves-the-world movie. |
|
captain
Landed Gentry
Posts: 905 
|
Post by captain on Apr 7, 2013 19:18:17 GMT -4
Maybe all he'll have to do is shoot them a smoldering look.
|
|
|
|
Post by lpatrice on May 10, 2013 21:52:14 GMT -4
I will probably see it. Big action flick, Brad Pitt, zombies, based on a book I really liked. But, at the same time I cannot help but just shake my head. I cannot believe $170 million dollars was spent to make it. I'm sure it will make it's budget back, but it probably won't make enough money to be really considered a huge hit. Too much competition this summer. And props to James Badge Dale who is in this, Iron Man 3, and The Lone Ranger. Jeez, when it rains it pours.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:53:52 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2013 1:02:44 GMT -4
The trailer looks generic as hell. Seriously you can't even tell that this is about zombies. And the CGI does not look impressive at all. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:53:52 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2013 23:04:42 GMT -4
I thought the same thing when I saw the preview today. I would not have even known that they were zombies if I had not read it here.
|
|
|
|
Post by lea1977 on May 20, 2013 4:08:20 GMT -4
I saw the trailer today before Star Trek. I wonder if that is intentional? That the zombies aren't really shown but I don't understand the reasoning behind it.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:53:52 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2013 7:36:13 GMT -4
Maybe the special effects for the zombies suck and they're trying to hide it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mugsy on May 20, 2013 12:59:30 GMT -4
Didn't they spend $170 million to make this movie? The special effects should not suck at that price.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:53:52 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2013 10:20:55 GMT -4
Didn't they spend $170 million to make this movie? The special effects should not suck at that price. Part of the reason for the huge cost is that the special effects team created cool-looking, gruesome, R-rating-worthy zombies, then were told to scrap all the work and start again because the movie needed PG-13 zombies. |
|
Wenton
Blueblood
Posts: 1,348
Nov 22, 2005 16:48:38 GMT -4
|
Post by Wenton on Jun 3, 2013 12:39:55 GMT -4
Shit, for $170, I could make gruesome PG-13 zombies.
This movie is going to be bad. Quality of the film regardless. Heads will roll.
|
|
