|
Post by MrsCatHead on Dec 9, 2013 12:55:55 GMT -4
I love how this is billed as an erotic movie. For reals? The books are a weird amalgam of vanilla BDSM. Not erotic at all.
|
|
|
Post by chonies on Dec 9, 2013 13:16:40 GMT -4
Even vanilla sex, or no sex at all, can be erotic if the mood is right. I know "erotic" is pretty much a YMMV thing, but this series is the antonym for erotic. Well, for me.
|
|
|
Post by bklynred on Jan 5, 2014 11:56:45 GMT -4
Ditto.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 4:17:58 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 23:16:16 GMT -4
For real.
|
|
|
Post by GoldenFleece on Jan 22, 2014 22:42:32 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by FotoStoreSheila on Jan 22, 2014 23:13:43 GMT -4
I love how this is billed as an erotic movie. For reals? The books are a weird amalgam of vanilla BDSM. Not erotic at all. All I can think of when someone classifies a movie as "erotic" is the terrible Seinfeld movie that later became a terrible musical Rochelle Rochelle-- A young girl's strange, erotic journey from Milan to Minsk.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 4:17:58 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 12:07:41 GMT -4
From the part of the book I read and excerpts I've seen on Jenny Reads 50 Shades, the book relies heavily on the reader being privy to Anastasia's thoughts. How does E.L. James expect that to translate to film? Should Anastasia have thought bubbles in various scenes that say "oh my" and discussing how Christian's pants (sweatpants, jeans, dress pants, ALL pants) hang in "that way" and make her feel "tingly down there"? How about a representation of Anastasia's subconscious chastising her throughout the movie where a cartoon bitchface suddenly pops up and slaps Anastasia in the face every now and then so that we know that Ana isn't as entirely stupid as her dialogue and behavior indicate. There's no way this movie can be any good without veering far, far away from the source material.
|
|
|
Post by GoldenFleece on Jan 23, 2014 12:49:00 GMT -4
From the part of the book I read and excerpts I've seen on Jenny Reads 50 Shades, the book relies heavily on the reader being privy to Anastasia's thoughts. How does E.L. James expect that to translate to film? Should Anastasia have thought bubbles in various scenes that say "oh my" and discussing how Christian's pants (sweatpants, jeans, dress pants, ALL pants) hang in "that way" and make her feel "tingly down there"? How about a representation of Anastasia's subconscious chastising her throughout the movie where a cartoon bitchface suddenly pops up and slaps Anastasia in the face every now and then so that we know that Ana isn't as entirely stupid as her dialogue and behavior indicate. There's no way this movie can be any good without veering far, far away from the source material. Not to give E.L. James the benefit of the doubt, but she might be hung up on them condensing scenes and characters, which is fairly typical for book-to-movie adaptations, but if she understands film as well as she does writing... She did write all those "oh mys" and "holy craps" in the first place, so she probably wouldn't see the issue with onscreen narration/voiceovers. Overall, though, since the 2000s, Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter were huge blockbuster movies and relatively faithful to the texts compared to how studios would have hacked up properties like that decades earlier (and even then, they were thinking about an American Hogwarts or condensing the early books into one movie). All the big book series that get adapted now, the studios make a great show of playing to the fans and courting their loyalty and keeping true to canon. It's primed audiences to expect fidelity to the text, to a large degree, in a way people first walking into, say, Gone with the Wind, wouldn't have expected.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 4:17:58 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 13:26:22 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 4:17:58 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 13:46:11 GMT -4
Mr. Grey looks like a dweeb.
|
|