tipsygrrl
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by tipsygrrl on Apr 22, 2006 14:03:47 GMT -4
Yes, that was him. That was part of what made me believe her. She said in the documents that 9/11 was one of the things he had become obsessed with and irrational about.
|
|
jilly
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by jilly on Apr 22, 2006 14:09:08 GMT -4
I doubt we'll know whether it was porn or not. It's not a criminal case but a divorce case. During custody battles, there's a lot of heresay. If they are contentious about joint custody, Denise could bring in witnesses to bolster her case, as to Charlie's abuse.
If even a fraction of what Denise says is true, I wouldn't want my little girls doing overnights with him either. He needs to get some help.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2006 14:15:11 GMT -4
I'm not flaming you. There are two sides. I just thought you were wondering if the pornography accusation could have been misconstrued. IF her statement is accurate, then no.
|
|
abigail
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by abigail on Apr 22, 2006 14:27:45 GMT -4
Jilly I totally agree.
|
|
crabbypatty
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by crabbypatty on Apr 22, 2006 14:39:28 GMT -4
Yes, that was him. That was part of what made me believe her. She said in the documents that 9/11 was one of the things he had become obsessed with and irrational about. What's gross is that he actually got play in the mainstream press for his lunatic rantings albeit it was short lived.
|
|
|
Post by Hamatron on Apr 22, 2006 14:40:41 GMT -4
Yeah, with someone else I maybe could see the research theory. But everything I've heard about him makes me think that he's mean and dumb. I just can't see him researching anything. In fact, I would be willing to bet that he's attached to the project in name only, or maybe with some *very* minor input. I mean, how many guys do you know that are into children's fashion? Can you even imagine the type of guy that would be into that? It would have to be either a cool hands-on Dad, a practical businessman looking to make a solid investment, someone's sweet gay uncle, or Michael Jackson. I don't see Charlie as any of those.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2006 15:10:20 GMT -4
According to the E! show, Kelly Preston was accidentally shot in the leg by a gun that Charlie was carrying in his pocket. Their engagement ended shortly thereafter.
As for the Sheens, Martin's turning him in took place LONG after Charlie's actions turned serious. I suspect he turned him in to save him from a drug overdose - as a way of saving his life. It's understandable, but watching that E! show indicated that Charlie had been in quite serious trouble all throughout high school. It seemed clear to me that without the family connections, he would have been in serious trouble with the law. It makes Martin Sheen's pompous preaching all the more hypocritical.
The interviews with Sheen during the E! show were quite revealing. He had a really cavalier attitude toward his misdeeds - at one point after he was arrested for drug possession, laughing because as he put it "...everyone was high then...". Surely his parents could have easily been aware of the atmosphere that Charlie was involved in while in high school. They had the financial resources to get him out of that environment and did not. I remember reading where when Angela Lansbury found that her son was involved with drugs when they lived in LA, she and her husband moved the entire family to Ireland to get their son away from that kind of situation.
|
|
abigail
Guest
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by abigail on Apr 22, 2006 15:25:38 GMT -4
I had always heard thru the grapevine alledgedly that he shot her in a rage , an arguement . He gave her a ring after the incident ( probably to shut her up ) and they said they were engaged , it last a few weeks and she was outta there .
And yes I think that Martin felt by turning him in , he was trying to save his life from an overdose.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2006 16:22:03 GMT -4
I believe porn sites involve wearing no clothes. What competition, other than the people who made the Emperor's new clothes, would trot out naked underage or underage looking girls to promote clothing?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 10:01:46 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2006 17:21:03 GMT -4
For a very brief time after his infamous Movieline interview, he claimed to have become a "born again" Christian.
Either he was lying in a attempt to rehabilitate his image and stay out of trouble with the courts, OR he really did try to turn his life around for a short period of time and he simply lapsed back into his old drug, drink and whores lifestyle.
|
|