Janet Jackson

[fictionista]

ramblingpj said:

The rumor about Janet having a child has been around for years. However, the age for the "child" doesn't add up. Someone who is 18 years old now would have either been born in late 1986 or 1987. Therefore, unless Janet and James reconciled for a brief moment after 1985 (in 1986 or 1987), this "child" couldn't be theirs.

Plus, how does "Young DeBarge" know this information? He was a mere child himself during Janet's and James' brief union in 1984. So, one can presume he was told this information by family members (if the rumor is true)? Nevertheless, in my opinion, if one is going to dispel a rumor, at least have the facts backed up with proof, e.g., correct age, birth certificate, or the like before going public.

Pretty much. I'm not a big fan of Janet or anything, but I'm going to need more evidence before I believe this. It's fun to speculate because I really do believe all of the Jackson's are crazy, but I can't take this as fact just yet.

[Deleted]

The Jackson's need to be shot into space. That family is so, so sick.

Here is a pic of the "daughter" she does look like her.
pic



I like what IDLYITW said;
"The Jacksons are some of the most insane people who ever walked the Earth. Joe and Katherine's psycho genes have managed to embed themselves in several generations of Jacksons. It would be awesome if someone was able to plant cameras in every Jackson home to see how much worse they are when they think humans aren't watching them. I imagine, like in the movie Cocoon, they peel off their skin so they can hang out as their normal alien selves except they're not cute or nice like the aliens in Cocoon. The Jackson aliens have teeth like great white sharks, walk on all fours and eat little brown boys that Michael hunts and captures for them. If we could only train them to eat their own young, then the world would be a lot safer."

[Deleted]

Your link is not working whitefalcon. Can you repost?

[Deleted]

Just checked it. The whole site is down. Try checking it later, it really looks like her.

[Deleted]

I'm not quite buying this situation yet myself. I'm waiting for info to come from Janet herself.

[LurkerNan]

If the whole site is down, I suspect conspiracy. Think the Jacksons can afford a computer hacker or two?

[CAgirl]

That picture isn't the daughter. Someone posted this on JJB. That's one of the Jackson brother's daughter. That picture is from a 20/20 episode on the Jacksons from some years ago. I don't think there is a picture of her out there on the web if she does exist.

[carrier76]

I agree w/ the people who say the timing doesn't add up. Her child would have to be over 20 since she has steadily been in the public eye since '86, and she wouldn't have had time to disappear to have a baby.

[Jcruz]

Why haven't Janet commented on this?

[Deleted]

A friend of mine gave birth a couple of years ago and she managed to hide her pregnancy pretty well (the baby was concieved sometime in late summer of the previous year and so by the time winter happened, the extra layers hid her stomach. Also, maybe Young fudged up the age, like how J-Lo's age seems to fluctuate all the time..

/Just my two cents...