duskwolf
Guest
Nov 24, 2024 5:31:33 GMT -4
|
Post by duskwolf on Jul 24, 2005 15:01:33 GMT -4
*shakes head*
You know, I used to be one of those people who snarked on all of those "who will think of the children?" campaigns, but between Dakota Fanning and little Jett, for the sake of the all holy f***, are these people f****** PRIMITIVES?
Treating children as little adults? Not exploring EVERY POSSIBLE METHOD to cure your child of ANY ailment he may suffer from? I'm not even anybody's mother, but I wouldn't even treat a cancer they way they treat these kids.
Bring Kelly Preston to me. We're going to have a little talk, which may include some slapping (if it will provide extra incentive for the men to spring into action, I'll try and promise some clothes-ripping, too).
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 5:31:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2005 20:15:02 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by JeanBean on Aug 2, 2005 20:34:47 GMT -4
They'd have to use IVF anyway b/c JT only does men these days.
Kelly Preston seems sweet and bland and kind of clueless. I find it hard to have much of a strong opinion of her.
|
|
celerydunk
Sloane Ranger
Posts: 2,521
May 3, 2005 21:57:59 GMT -4
|
Post by celerydunk on Aug 3, 2005 21:23:15 GMT -4
Whenever I see Stepford Wives it reminds me of the original one (I didnt see the Nicole Kidman version) and it makes me think of Kelly Preston. I think she is completely incapable of an original thought of her own. She is what Katie will be in about 5 years.
|
|
roxpopuli
Guest
Nov 24, 2024 5:31:33 GMT -4
|
Post by roxpopuli on Aug 4, 2005 10:40:42 GMT -4
Pump that little adult with vitamins and get him to a sauna and an audit STAT!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 5:31:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2005 10:47:31 GMT -4
I've seriously not liked her as an actress since I saw her "performance" in For the Love of The Game with Kevin Costner...her scene at the hospital is cringe inducing...
|
|
|
Post by Oxynia on Aug 4, 2005 10:56:20 GMT -4
In terms of her presence as an actress, I would completely agree. Problem is, she has a habit of running her mouth in public on subjects like psychiatry and medicine, for which she is ill-qualified. But for her lunatic ravings, she wouldn't show up on my radar, either.
|
|
zivvie
Sloane Ranger
Aragorn will always be beautiful.
Posts: 2,714
Mar 8, 2005 15:48:15 GMT -4
|
Post by zivvie on Aug 4, 2005 13:19:39 GMT -4
From that goofy iparenting article: Because...USC's drama/film programs are so lame? And Kelly wanted to be a "serious" actress-with-a-capital-A? O-kay.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 5:31:33 GMT -4
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2005 20:40:08 GMT -4
Neutrogena has hired her to flog their new anti-wrinkle serum with Retinol. I was hoping that would qualify as a drug, but it's a vitamin A derivative.
I'm surprised she still goes by Preston, you would think as a proper little clam beard, she'd be Kelly Preston-Travolta or just Kelly Travolta.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Aug 18, 2005 21:10:45 GMT -4
Speaking of Kelly, I read an interview with Alexander Payne the other day where he talked about all the things Miramax made him do when he directed Citizen Ruth: they made him change the title, change the ending, approve a poster he didn't like, and accept a cast member that he didn't want. I know for a fact the cast member wasn't Laura Dern, Burt Reynolds, or Swoosie Kurtz. And I doubt Miramax has strong feelings about Kurtwood Smith or Mary Kay Place, so that leaves Kelly. Miramax's way of repaying Travolta for starring in Pulp Fiction for no money? Or just general sucking up? I remember Kelly promoting CR as if it were a big career breakthrough for her. And she was fine in it, but it's not like her part was spectacular.
|
|